Closed editorialbot closed 8 months ago
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@editorialbot recommend-accept
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1016/j.softx.2019.100361 is OK
- 10.1561/2400000003 is OK
- 10.1007/978-1-4419-9569-8_10 is OK
- 10.1561/2200000016 is OK
- 10.1007/s10851-010-0251-1 is OK
- 10.1093/gji/ggab388 is OK
- 10.1109/GlobalSIP.2013.6737048 is OK
- 10.1190/tle42070457.1 is OK
- 10.3997/2214-4609.2022616015 is OK
- 10.1109/tci.2024.3359178 is OK
- 10.3997/2214-4609.2021612003 is OK
- 10.1007/s11081-018-9380-y is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.4486431 is OK
- 10.1145/2897824.2925875 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: proxalgs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The Proximity Operator Repository
INVALID DOIs
- None
:wave: @openjournals/dsais-eics, this paper is ready to be accepted and published.
Check final proof :point_right::page_facing_up: Download article
If the paper PDF and the deposit XML files look good in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/5121, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the command @editorialbot accept
@mrava87 great, thanks! Our job is done for now. Let's wait for the editor in chief to do a final check and ship this :-)
Great! thanks a lot for guiding me through this @sappelhoff, it has been a pleasure :-)
@editorialbot accept
Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...
Ensure proper citation by uploading a plain text CITATION.cff file to the default branch of your repository.
If using GitHub, a Cite this repository menu will appear in the About section, containing both APA and BibTeX formats. When exported to Zotero using a browser plugin, Zotero will automatically create an entry using the information contained in the .cff file.
You can copy the contents for your CITATION.cff file here:
``` cff-version: "1.2.0" authors: - family-names: Ravasi given-names: Matteo orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0020-2721" - family-names: Γrnhag given-names: Marcus Valtonen orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8687-227X" - family-names: Luiken given-names: Nick orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3307-1748" - family-names: Leblanc given-names: Olivier orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3641-1875" - family-names: UruΓ±uela given-names: Eneko orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6849-9088" contact: - family-names: Ravasi given-names: Matteo orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0020-2721" doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10805997 message: If you use this software, please cite our article in the Journal of Open Source Software. preferred-citation: authors: - family-names: Ravasi given-names: Matteo orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0020-2721" - family-names: Γrnhag given-names: Marcus Valtonen orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8687-227X" - family-names: Luiken given-names: Nick orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3307-1748" - family-names: Leblanc given-names: Olivier orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3641-1875" - family-names: UruΓ±uela given-names: Eneko orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6849-9088" date-published: 2024-03-13 doi: 10.21105/joss.06326 issn: 2475-9066 issue: 95 journal: Journal of Open Source Software publisher: name: Open Journals start: 6326 title: PyProximal - scalable convex optimization in Python type: article url: "https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.06326" volume: 9 title: PyProximal - scalable convex optimization in Python ```
If the repository is not hosted on GitHub, a .cff file can still be uploaded to set your preferred citation. Users will be able to manually copy and paste the citation.
πππ π Toot for this paper π πππ
π¨π¨π¨ THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! π¨π¨π¨
Here's what you must now do:
Any issues? Notify your editorial technical team...
@sappelhoff just to confirm that the paper DOI works and everything looks good :)
But I do not seem to be able myself to close this issue (point 2), I guess you can...
Thanks again everyone, @sappelhoff @nirum and @ewu63!
Thanks everyone!
:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:
If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:
Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.06326/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.06326)
HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.06326">
<img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.06326/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>
reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.06326/status.svg
:target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.06326
This is how it will look in your documentation:
We need your help!
The Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@mrava87<!--end-author-handle-- (Matteo Ravasi) Repository: http://github.com/pylops/pyproximal/ Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss Version: v0.8.0 Editor: !--editor-->@sappelhoff<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @nirum, @ewu63 Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.10805997
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@nirum & @ewu63, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @sappelhoff know.
β¨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest β¨
Checklists
π Checklist for @ewu63
π Checklist for @nirum