[PRE REVIEW]: MIRP: A Python package for standardised radiomics

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@alexzwanenburg<!--end-author-handle-- (Alex Zwanenburg) Repository: https://github.com/oncoray/mirp Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper Version: v2.1.0 Editor: !--editor-->@emdupre<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @surajpaib, @Matthew-Jennings, @drcandacemakedamoore, @theanega Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/165c85b1ecad891550a21b12c8b2e577"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/165c85b1ecad891550a21b12c8b2e577/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/165c85b1ecad891550a21b12c8b2e577/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/165c85b1ecad891550a21b12c8b2e577)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @alexzwanenburg. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@alexzwanenburg if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1038/s41571-022-00707-0 is OK
- 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.162 is OK
- 10.1148/radiol.2020191145 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-017-13448-3 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-018-36938-4 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-022-13967-8 is OK
- 10.1148/radiol.211604 is OK
- 10.1148/radiol.231319 is OK
- 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.141 is OK
- 10.1038/s41467-023-44591-3 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=1.10 s (163.4 files/s, 48171.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                         104           5692           4648          19852
HTML                            25           1334             75           7703
Markdown                        12           1193              0           5535
SVG                              2              1              1           2996
JavaScript                      12            131            221            880
CSS                              4            190             35            779
reStructuredText                 7            169            159            351
XML                              4              0            336            256
TeX                              1             19              0            236
R                                1             25              8             77
YAML                             3              6              4             57
TOML                             1              5              0             47
DOS Batch                        2              8              1             28
make                             1              4              7              9
Bourne Shell                     1              0              0              1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           180           8777           5495          38807
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1025

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

mrivis: Medical image visualization library for neuroscience in python Submitting author: @raamana Handling editor: @arokem (Retired) Reviewers: @miykael Similarity score: 0.8356

PyMedPhys: A community effort to develop an open, Python-based standard library for medical physics applications Submitting author: @Matthew-Jennings Handling editor: @osorensen (Active) Reviewers: @ProfLeao, @gbaltz Similarity score: 0.8329

libfmp: A Python Package for Fundamentals of Music Processing Submitting author: @fzalkow Handling editor: @arfon (Active) Reviewers: @brunaw, @expectopatronum Similarity score: 0.8267

CleanX: A Python library for data cleaning of large sets of radiology images Submitting author: @drcandacemakedamoore Handling editor: @cMadan (Active) Reviewers: @henrykironde, @anki-xyz Similarity score: 0.8245

PoreSpy: A Python Toolkit for Quantitative Analysis of Porous Media Images Submitting author: @jgostick Handling editor: @usethedata (Retired) Reviewers: @yxqd, @cr458 Similarity score: 0.8196

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[alexzwanenburg]

Potential reviewers:

• Olivia Prior Palomares (theanega)
• Phil Chlap (pchlap)
• Suraj Pai (surajpaib)
• André Pedersen (andreped)

[alexzwanenburg]

R and Tex labels can be removed from this issue. The software is fully in Python.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot invite @emdupre as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[emdupre]

Thanks for the invitation, @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman ! Happy to take this

[emdupre]

@editorialbot assign @emdupre as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @emdupre is now the editor

[emdupre]

👋 Hi @alexzwanenburg, and thanks for your submission to JOSS !

I see that you have suggested several potential reviewers, thank you !

I'll put together a list of folks to reach out to as reviewers based on these suggestions and my own recommendations. I'll update this thread with that outreach.

[emdupre]

👋 Hi @Matthew-Jennings, @surajpaib, @andreped,

Would you be willing to review MIRP: A Python package for standardised radiomics for JOSS (the Journal of Open Source Software)?

You can learn more about reviewing for JOSS -- including our conflict of interest policy -- here.

The review takes place on GitHub and focuses on the software and this short paper: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/blob/joss.06345/joss.06345/10.21105.joss.06345.pdf

If you're available to review this work within the next month—or six weeks, at most—please let me know and I'll add you as a reviewer.

Once I have sufficient reviewers I'll open a dedicated review issue.

Thank you for considering !

[andreped]

@emdupre I am busy finalizing my PhD atm, so I am unable to review this submission.

[emdupre]

Thank you for letting us know @andreped !

Please feel free to mute this issue so that you don't receive any additional pings. And best of luck with finishing up your degree !

[surajpaib]

@emdupre Hi Elizabeth, I'm happy to review this work.

@alexzwanenburg Thank you for the recommendation!

[emdupre]

Thank you, @surajpaib !

I'll add you as a reviewer on this issue now. Once we have a sufficient number of reviewers, I'll open a dedicated review issue 🚀

[emdupre]

@editorialbot add @surajpaib as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@surajpaib added to the reviewers list!

[emdupre]

👋 Hi @drcandacemakedamoore, @theanega, @Matthew-Jennings,

Would you be willing to review MIRP: A Python package for standardised radiomics for JOSS (the Journal of Open Source Software)?

You can learn more about reviewing for JOSS -- including our conflict of interest policy -- here.

The review takes place on GitHub and focuses on the software and this short paper: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/blob/joss.06345/joss.06345/10.21105.joss.06345.pdf

If you're available to review this work within the next month—or six weeks, at most—please let me know and I'll add you as a reviewer.

Once I have sufficient reviewers I'll open a dedicated review issue.

Thank you for considering !

[Matthew-Jennings]

Hi @emdupre. Sure! Happy to review. No conflicts of interest to disclose.

[emdupre]

Thank you, @Matthew-Jennings !

I'll add you as a reviewer on this issue now. Once we have a sufficient number of reviewers, I'll open a dedicated review issue 🚀

[emdupre]

@editorialbot add @Matthew-Jennings as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@Matthew-Jennings added to the reviewers list!

[drcandacemakedamoore]

Hello @emdupre I will be happy to review the work.

[theanega]

Hi,

Happy to review too! Thanks, Olivia

On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 at 18:37, Elizabeth DuPre @.***> wrote:

👋 Hi @drcandacemakedamoore https://github.com/drcandacemakedamoore, @theanega https://github.com/theanega, @Matthew-Jennings https://github.com/Matthew-Jennings,

Would you be willing to review MIRP: A Python package for standardised radiomics for JOSS (the Journal of Open Source Software)?

You can learn more about reviewing for JOSS -- including our conflict of interest policy -- here.

The review takes place on GitHub and focuses on the software and this short paper:

https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/blob/joss.06345/joss.06345/10.21105.joss.06345.pdf

If you're available to review this work within the next month—or six weeks, at most—please let me know and I'll add you as a reviewer.

Once I have sufficient reviewers I'll open a dedicated review issue.

Thank you for considering !

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6345#issuecomment-1961732336, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARNRMPTLER4XDTO5OAFJH73YVDHW5AVCNFSM6AAAAABDE4MI6OVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNRRG4ZTEMZTGY . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[emdupre]

Thank you, @drcandacemakedamoore and @theanega ! I'll add you both as reviewers now.

We'll then have a sufficient number of reviewers, so I'll go ahead and open the dedicated review issue ! 🚀

[emdupre]

@editorialbot add @drcandacemakedamoore as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@drcandacemakedamoore added to the reviewers list!

[emdupre]

@editorialbot add @theanega as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@theanega added to the reviewers list!

[emdupre]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6413.