Closed editorialbot closed 2 months ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1017/S1743921312000440 is OK
- 10.22201/ia.14052059p.2022.54.01 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2305.06943 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-031-51723-5_53 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7717030 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The tactile graphics helper: providing audio clari...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Inspecting spectra with sound: proof-of-concept & ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Sound training platform applied to astronomy
INVALID DOIs
- https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2590 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11091882 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.03 s (1788.9 files/s, 129331.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 34 317 185 1133
HTML 17 82 25 881
PO File 2 163 342 723
TeX 1 9 0 76
Markdown 1 37 0 70
CSS 1 10 0 43
YAML 1 1 5 19
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 57 619 557 2945
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
70 NatashaBertaina
31 Natasha
30 Gonzalo Cayo
7 n.bertaina@alumno.um.edu.ar
1 Gonza1290
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 1946
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
✅ License found: MIT License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
s(ound)lab: An easy to learn Python package for designing and running psychoacoustic experiments.
Submitting author: @DrMarc
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @hadware, @sneakers-the-rat
Similarity score: 0.6917
PhysioLabXR: A Python Platform for Real-Time, Multi-modal, Brain–Computer Interfaces and Extended Reality Experiments
Submitting author: @ApocalyVec
Handling editor: @mstimberg (Active)
Reviewers: @lucask07, @nastaran62
Similarity score: 0.6801
libsoni: A Python Toolbox for Sonifying Music Annotations and Feature Representations
Submitting author: @yiitozer
Handling editor: @osorensen (Active)
Reviewers: @expectopatronum, @ren-zeng
Similarity score: 0.6719
guitarsounds: A Python package to visualize harmonic sounds for musical instrument design
Submitting author: @olivecha
Handling editor: @bmcfee (Active)
Reviewers: @cwitkowitz, @ebezzam
Similarity score: 0.6689
Soundata: Reproducible use of audio datasets
Submitting author: @magdalenafuentes
Handling editor: @faroit (Active)
Reviewers: @hagenw, @hadware
Similarity score: 0.6641
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
@NatashaBertaina Dear author, thanks for this submission. I am the AEiC on this track and here to help process the initial steps. I have briefly reviewed the paper and the repository. Unfortunately this work is currently not conforming to JOSS standards. I will therefore proceed to reject this submission.
Major issues/concerns:
CONTRIBUTING.md
file (see here for some examples: https://contributing.md/example/).Minor other points:
.bib
file, and call @editorialbot check references
here to check them again. Any potential re-submission should clearly address all the above points. However, given the relatively small size, the web-based functionality, and focus on education/training, it is likely it will be flagged for potentially being out of scope.
@editorialbot reject
Paper rejected.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@NatashaBertaina<!--end-author-handle-- (Natasha María Monserrat Bertaina Lucero) Repository: https://github.com/NatashaBertaina/webTraining Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @NatashaBertaina. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@NatashaBertaina if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: