Closed editorialbot closed 3 months ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.02 s (1479.6 files/s, 177781.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R 10 173 13 1046
C++ 2 70 20 829
Markdown 5 39 0 163
TeX 3 18 0 154
YAML 3 18 5 81
Rmd 2 98 279 68
C/C++ Header 1 15 1 34
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 26 431 318 2375
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
94 robin
40 RobinHankin
1 Robin Hankin
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- None
MISSING DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Anti-associative algebras
INVALID DOIs
- None
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 173
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v3.0
(Check here for OSI approval)
:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.
👋 @RobinHankin - thanks for your submission.
Note that your paper does not compile. Please follow the example paper and note that you can click on the error above to find out more about it. Please feel free to make changes to your .md file, then use the command @editorialbot generate pdf
to make a new PDF. editorialbot commands need to be the first entry in a new comment.
Also, your paper is remarkably short, and doesn't really explain to a general (non-mathematician) audience what this software is or why it is needed. It also doesn't have any references, which seems unusual for scientific work. You might want to extend it a bit, perhaps with a bit of what's in the README as well.
In addition, the JOSS editors will evaluate the scope in terms of the effort, once there is a paper that compiles. It appears that the main directory (R) has about 650 lines of code and this seems to have a commit history of a few months, both of which may be issues of scholarly effort (see https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#substantial-scholarly-effort)
@editorialbot generate pdf
:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.
@danielskatz thanks for this. I am currently looking at the compilation issue [I could not figure out how to get the editorialbot to generate the PDF before submission, can you advise?], but in the meantime, the submission is written in R and C with a total of 1678 lines of code, within scope? Also, there is a reference list but perhaps the compilation failure rendered it invisible.
In any event, I will extend paper.md
as you suggest.
Best wishes
Robin
I think the affiliation part of the .md file needs to be more like the example
affiliations:
- name: University of Stirling, UK
index: 1
rather than
affiliations: name "University of Stirling"
And I missed the C++ code, so the LOCs might be less of an issue, but the short commit history still might
Once the paper does compile, please use the command @editorialbot check references
to make sure there are DOIs for everything that should have them
@editorialbot generate pdf
:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
Ryacas: A computer algebra system in R
Submitting author: @mikldk
Handling editor: @drvinceknight (Active)
Reviewers: @MikeLydeamore, @EduPH
Similarity score: 0.5968
datastructures: An R package for organisation and storage of data
Submitting author: @dirmeier
Handling editor: @karthik (Retired)
Reviewers: @fabian-s
Similarity score: 0.5901
OApackage: A Python package for generation and analysis of orthogonal arrays, optimal designs and conference designs
Submitting author: @eendebakpt
Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active)
Reviewers: @djmitche, @gsagnol
Similarity score: 0.5792
Cadabra2: computer algebra for field theory revisited
Submitting author: @kpeeters
Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active)
Reviewers: @StewMH, @henrik227
Similarity score: 0.5788
The psycho Package: an Efficient and Publishing-Oriented Workflow for Psychological Science
Submitting author: @DominiqueMakowski
Handling editor: @leeper (Retired)
Reviewers: @SachaEpskamp
Similarity score: 0.5764
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
@editorialbot query scope
As I mentioned previously, due to the relatively short commit history, the editors will now discuss if this submission meets the substantial scholarly effort criterion for review by JOSS. You should hear back in a week or two.
Submission flagged for editorial review.
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- None
MISSING DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Anti-associative algebras
INVALID DOIs
- None
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.48550/arXiv.2202.10812 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
Ryacas: A computer algebra system in R
Submitting author: @mikldk
Handling editor: @drvinceknight (Active)
Reviewers: @MikeLydeamore, @EduPH
Similarity score: 0.6705
OApackage: A Python package for generation and analysis of orthogonal arrays, optimal designs and conference designs
Submitting author: @eendebakpt
Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active)
Reviewers: @djmitche, @gsagnol
Similarity score: 0.6636
Cadabra2: computer algebra for field theory revisited
Submitting author: @kpeeters
Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active)
Reviewers: @StewMH, @henrik227
Similarity score: 0.6601
TDAstats: R pipeline for computing persistent homology in topological data analysis
Submitting author: @rrrlw
Handling editor: @leeper (Retired)
Reviewers: @corybrunson
Similarity score: 0.6529
PySymmPol - Symmetric Polynomials
Submitting author: @thraraujo
Handling editor: @phibeck (Active)
Reviewers: @eliotwrobson, @AnnikaStein
Similarity score: 0.6500
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.48550/arXiv.2202.10812 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-031-19293-7 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1155/5708 may be a valid DOI for title: Algebra
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Calculus on manifolds
- No DOI given, and none found for title: An introduction to nonassociative algebras
INVALID DOIs
- None
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
Ryacas: A computer algebra system in R
Submitting author: @mikldk
Handling editor: @drvinceknight (Active)
Reviewers: @MikeLydeamore, @EduPH
Similarity score: 0.6892
OApackage: A Python package for generation and analysis of orthogonal arrays, optimal designs and conference designs
Submitting author: @eendebakpt
Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active)
Reviewers: @djmitche, @gsagnol
Similarity score: 0.6840
Economiccomplexity: Computational Methods for Economic Complexity
Submitting author: @pachamaltese
Handling editor: @oliviaguest (Active)
Reviewers: @JohnCoene, @mpadge
Similarity score: 0.6794
PySymmPol - Symmetric Polynomials
Submitting author: @thraraujo
Handling editor: @phibeck (Active)
Reviewers: @eliotwrobson, @AnnikaStein
Similarity score: 0.6780
TDAstats: R pipeline for computing persistent homology in topological data analysis
Submitting author: @rrrlw
Handling editor: @leeper (Retired)
Reviewers: @corybrunson
Similarity score: 0.6767
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.48550/arXiv.2202.10812 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-031-19293-7 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2303.06062 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1155/5708 may be a valid DOI for title: Algebra
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Calculus on manifolds
- No DOI given, and none found for title: An introduction to nonassociative algebras
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Normed division algebras with R: introducing the o...
INVALID DOIs
- None
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
Ryacas: A computer algebra system in R
Submitting author: @mikldk
Handling editor: @drvinceknight (Active)
Reviewers: @MikeLydeamore, @EduPH
Similarity score: 0.6890
OApackage: A Python package for generation and analysis of orthogonal arrays, optimal designs and conference designs
Submitting author: @eendebakpt
Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active)
Reviewers: @djmitche, @gsagnol
Similarity score: 0.6840
Economiccomplexity: Computational Methods for Economic Complexity
Submitting author: @pachamaltese
Handling editor: @oliviaguest (Active)
Reviewers: @JohnCoene, @mpadge
Similarity score: 0.6798
PySymmPol - Symmetric Polynomials
Submitting author: @thraraujo
Handling editor: @phibeck (Active)
Reviewers: @eliotwrobson, @AnnikaStein
Similarity score: 0.6780
TDAstats: R pipeline for computing persistent homology in topological data analysis
Submitting author: @rrrlw
Handling editor: @leeper (Retired)
Reviewers: @corybrunson
Similarity score: 0.6772
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
Thanks @RobinHankin - the paper looks good enough to go into review, but let's see what the editors say about the scholarly effort, which should be a week or two...
👋 @RobinHankin - I'm sorry to say that after discussion amongst the JOSS editors, we have decided that this submission does not meet the substantial scholarly effort criterion for review by JOSS. Please see https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#other-venues-for-reviewing-and-publishing-software-packages for other suggestions for how you might receive credit for your work.
@editorialbot reject
Paper rejected.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@RobinHankin<!--end-author-handle-- (Robin Hankin) Repository: https://github.com/RobinHankin/evitaicossa Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: 0.0-2 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @RobinHankin. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@RobinHankin if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: