[PRE REVIEW]: EMGFlow: A Python package for pre-processing and feature extraction of electromyographic signals

editorialbot commented 3 months ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@WiIIson@faroit@wbaccinelli<!--end-reviewers-list-- Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d63dac2393dede4adb8ebc6910f3b65c"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d63dac2393dede4adb8ebc6910f3b65c/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d63dac2393dede4adb8ebc6910f3b65c/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d63dac2393dede4adb8ebc6910f3b65c)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @WiIIson. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@WiIIson if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

editorialbot commented 3 months ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 3 months ago

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1109/TAFFC.2015.2392932 is OK
- 10.1016/j.softx.2024.101712 is OK
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3146729 is OK
- 10.1109/TAFFC.2015.2457417 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00676.x is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.6403363 is OK
- 10.1007/s12253-019-00668-3 is OK
- 10.1109/T-AFFC.2011.15 is OK
- 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00780 is OK
- 10.3758/s13428-020-01516-y is OK
- 10.3389/fneur.2020.576729 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-021-85163-z is OK
- 10.1145/3242969.3242985 is OK
- 10.1038/s41597-019-0209-0 is OK
- 10.3389/fict.2017.00001 is OK
- 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0214) is OK
- 10.1073/pnas.0908994106 is OK
- 10.1186/1743-0003-7-21 is OK
- 10.1109/SSCI.2016.7849931 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: A practicum on the use of sEMG signals in movement...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: An electromyographic index for localized muscle fa...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: A novel feature extraction for robust EMG pattern ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: PhysioData Toolbox
- 10.1152/jappl.1983.54.1.51 may be a valid DOI for title: Changes in electromyogram power spectra of facial ...

INVALID DOIs

- None

editorialbot commented 3 months ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.03 s (910.9 files/s, 217554.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Markdown                        11           1210              0           2176
Python                          11            668           1550           1249
TeX                              1             24              0            342
YAML                             2             17              0             92
TOML                             1              2              0             28
JSON                             4              0              0             24
INI                              1              3              0             19
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            31           1924           1550           3930
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   143  WiIIson

editorialbot commented 3 months ago

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1653

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot commented 3 months ago

License info:

🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v3.0 (Check here for OSI approval)

editorialbot commented 3 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 3 months ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

pyemgpipeline: A Python package for electromyography processing Submitting author: @tlwu Handling editor: @osorensen (Active) Reviewers: @tuliofalmeida, @osorensen Similarity score: 0.7688

mhealthtools: A Modular R Package for Extracting Features from Mobile and Wearable Sensor Data Submitting author: @philerooski Handling editor: @trallard (Retired) Reviewers: @Ebedthan, @AKuederle Similarity score: 0.7501

ReSurfEMG: A Python library for preprocessing and analysis of respiratory EMG. Submitting author: @drcandacemakedamoore Handling editor: @AJQuinn (Retired) Reviewers: @ixjlyons, @ajbaird Similarity score: 0.7391

Biosiglive: an Open-Source Python Package for Real-time Biosignal Processing Submitting author: @aceglia Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active) Reviewers: @finsberg, @marcoghislieri Similarity score: 0.7384

biopeaks: a graphical user interface for feature extraction from heart- and breathing biosignals Submitting author: @JanCBrammer Handling editor: @oliviaguest (Active) Reviewers: @TomDonoghue, @sappelhoff, @jamesheathers Similarity score: 0.7117

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 3 months ago

@editorialbot invite @faroit as editor

editorialbot commented 3 months ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

faroit commented 3 months ago

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman This is not in my domain of applications but the signal processing techniques are similar so I can edit this.

I'm on vacation this week so I will start next week

faroit commented 3 months ago

@editorialbot assign @faroit as editor

editorialbot commented 3 months ago

Assigned! @faroit is now the editor

WiIIson commented 3 months ago

Hi,

Thanks for considering our submission for publication. Here is a list of reviewers we believe would be relevant to the work:

Dr Lara McManus, Trinity College Dublin, lara.mc-manus@ucdconnect.ie
Dr. Angkoon Phinyomark, University of New Brunswick, aphinyom@unb.ca
Dr Sato Wataru, RIKEN research institute, wataru.sato.ya@riken.jp
Dr Mohammad Soleymani, University of Southern California, soleymani@ict.usc.edu
Dr Madeleine Lowery, University College Dublin, madeleine.lowery@ucd.ie
Dr Dominique Makowski, University of Sussex, D.Makowski@sussex.ac.uk

faroit commented 2 months ago

👋 hi @WiIIson, just to let you know, I am now starting the reviewer-finding process.

WiIIson commented 2 months ago

Thank you for starting the review process. We realized that reviewers must have a GitHub account, so here are some new reviewers who have GitHub pages:

Carlos Carreiras
- GitHub: https://github.com/capcarr
- Website: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ccarreiras/
Dominique Makowski
- GitHub: https://github.com/DominiqueMakowski
- Website: https://dominiquemakowski.github.io/
Mohammed Soleymani
- GitHub: https://github.com/msoley
- Website: https://ict.usc.edu/about-us/leadership/research-leadership/mohammad-soleymani/
Tsung-Lin Wu
- GitHub: https://github.com/tlwu
Meghasyam Tummalacherla
- GitHub: https://github.com/itismeghasyam
- Website: https://www.linkedin.com/in/meghasyam/
Candace Makeda Moore
- GitHub: https://github.com/drcandacemakedamoore
- Website: https://www.esciencecenter.nl/team/candace-makeda-moore/

srlivingstone commented 2 months ago

Hi @faroit - I'm checking in on the pre-review process. Would you please provide an update on the search for reviewers?

faroit commented 2 months ago

@srlivingstone thanks for pushing here. I was unable to check back here and I'm sorry, i didn't notified anyone. I'm back on this pre-review now.

@WiIIson I didn't had any luck so far finding reviewers outside on private channels, so I'm happy to go forward with your proposals

faroit commented 2 months ago

@drcandacemakedamoore @itismeghasyam @tlwu @msoley @DominiqueMakowski @capcarr - would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? The JOSS review process takes place on GitHub and focuses on the software and a short paper. We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

The software under review is https://github.com/WiIIson/EMGFlow-Python-Package

This issue is a "pre-review" issue in which reviewers are assigned. Once sufficient reviewers are recruited we will open a dedicated review issue where the review will take place.

srlivingstone commented 1 month ago

Hi @faroit, not sure if you heard back on those invitations; would another round of names from us be helpful?

drcandacemakedamoore commented 1 month ago

Hello, I just saw this now. I will be unable to review this library this year. If you email me I can provide some suggestions for reviewers.

On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 4:24 PM Steven R. Livingstone < @.***> wrote:

Hi @faroit https://github.com/faroit, not sure if you heard back on those invitations; would another round of names from us be helpful?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/7054#issuecomment-2397081980, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHMYSAKWBELRLE4KSXFFS3TZ2KKS7AVCNFSM6AAAAABLVYAIASVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGOJXGA4DCOJYGA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

faroit commented 1 month ago

@srlivingstone yes, please. I also contacted a few folks in academia to help but without success so far.

drcandacemakedamoore commented 1 month ago

I have spoken to Dr. Walter Baccinelli at the eScience Center. He said he would be willing to review the package. Please contact me for his email.

faroit commented 1 month ago

@wbaccinelli We received a post from @drcandacemakedamoore (see above) that you would be willing to review this submission for JOSS? The JOSS review process takes place on GitHub and focuses on the software and a short paper. We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

The software under review is https://github.com/WiIIson/EMGFlow-Python-Package

This issue is a "pre-review" issue in which reviewers are assigned. Once sufficient reviewers are recruited we will open a dedicated review issue where the review will take place.

Please let us know. Thanks in advance

wbaccinelli commented 1 month ago

Hi @faroit, I confirm that I am available for reviewing the submission.

faroit commented 1 month ago

@wbaccinelli thats great news!

faroit commented 1 month ago

@editorialbot add @wbaccinelli as reviewer

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

@wbaccinelli added to the reviewers list!

WiIIson commented 1 month ago

Hi @faroit, here are some additional potential reviewers that may be relevant to this project:

Kevin Mattheus Moerman (https://github.com/Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman)
Elizabeth DuPre (https://github.com/emdupre)
Øystein Sørensen (https://github.com/osorensen)
Clemens Brunner (https://github.com/cbrnr)
Victor Férat (https://github.com/vferat)
Matt Caudill (https://github.com/mscaudill)
Nan Liu (https://github.com/charlienew)
Robert Richer (https://github.com/richrobe)
Andrew Quinn (https://github.com/AJQuinn)
Tulio Almeida (https://github.com/tuliofalmeida)
Tom Donoghue (https://github.com/TomDonoghue)
Stefan Appelhoff (https://github.com/sappelhoff)
Brian McFee (https://github.com/bmcfee)
Marco Ghislieri (https://github.com/marcoghislieri)

srlivingstone commented 3 weeks ago

Hi @faroit, we've provided a longer list of potential reviewers for you to consider. All of these either published in JOSS, or have previously reviewed for JOSS, and so should be familiar with git.

faroit commented 1 day ago

@emdupre @osorensen @cbrnr @vferat @mscaudill @charlienew @richrobe @AJQuinn @tuliofalmeida @TomDonoghue @sappelhoff @marcoghislieri would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? The JOSS review process takes place on GitHub and focuses on the software and a short paper. We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

The software under review is https://github.com/WiIIson/EMGFlow-Python-Package

This issue is a "pre-review" issue in which reviewers are assigned. Once sufficient reviewers are recruited we will open a dedicated review issue where the review will take place.

osorensen commented 1 day ago

@faroit, thanks for asking but I'm a JOSS editor, so will decline this one.

marcoghislieri commented 1 day ago

Dear All,

Thank you for considering me to review this submission. Unfortunately, I am currently unavailable to take on this task.

I appreciate your understanding.

Sincerely,

Marco Ghislieri, PhD

Assistant Professor with time contract

PolitoBIOMed Lab | Department of Electronics and Telecommunications

Politecnico di Torino

● Scopushttps://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57202379042 / ResearchGatehttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marco-Ghislieri / LinkedInhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/marco-ghislieri/

● Websitehttps://www.polito.it/personale?p=marco.ghislieri

[cid:923a0138-0613-44c4-98da-50a00395108b]

From: Fabian-Robert Stöter @.> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2024 10:56 PM To: openjournals/joss-reviews @.> Cc: Marco Ghislieri @.>; Mention @.> Subject: Re: [openjournals/joss-reviews] [PRE REVIEW]: EMGFlow: A Python package for pre-processing and feature extraction of electromyographic signals (Issue #7054)

@emduprehttps://github.com/emdupre @osorensenhttps://github.com/osorensen @cbrnrhttps://github.com/cbrnr @vferathttps://github.com/vferat @mscaudillhttps://github.com/mscaudill @charlienewhttps://github.com/charlienew @richrobehttps://github.com/richrobe @AJQuinnhttps://github.com/AJQuinn @tuliofalmeidahttps://github.com/tuliofalmeida @TomDonoghuehttps://github.com/TomDonoghue @sappelhoffhttps://github.com/sappelhoff @marcoghislierihttps://github.com/marcoghislieri would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? The JOSS review process takes place on GitHub and focuses on the software and a short paper. We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

The software under review is https://github.com/WiIIson/EMGFlow-Python-Package

This issue is a "pre-review" issue in which reviewers are assigned. Once sufficient reviewers are recruited we will open a dedicated review issue where the review will take place.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/7054#issuecomment-2492419246, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AP7RPNL3DFQ6WBMOZQ55MOL2BZJKPAVCNFSM6AAAAABLVYAIASVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDIOJSGQYTSMRUGY. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

sappelhoff commented 1 day ago

Dear all, I have to decline too, due to several other obligations that take precedence. Good luck!

openjournals / joss-reviews

[PRE REVIEW]: EMGFlow: A Python package for pre-processing and feature extraction of electromyographic signals #7054

Status