[PRE REVIEW]: seismolab: A Python package for analyzing space-based observations of variable stars

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@astrobatty<!--end-author-handle-- (Attila Bódi) Repository: https://github.com/konkolyseismolab/seismolab Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.1.2 Editor: !--editor-->@warrickball<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @keatonb, @darthoctopus Managing EiC: Dan Foreman-Mackey

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/45d943030801e47eb71bbd445ca4b957"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/45d943030801e47eb71bbd445ca4b957/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/45d943030801e47eb71bbd445ca4b957/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/45d943030801e47eb71bbd445ca4b957)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @astrobatty. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@astrobatty if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb51656.x is OK
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14625.x is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201322361 is OK
- 10.3847/0004-637X/818/2/130 is OK
- 10.1051/aas:2000332 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-3881/abd806 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4365/abd4e3 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4365/ac2ee2 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stad556 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/202346094 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: The O-C Diagram: Basic Procedures

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.06 s (848.1 files/s, 181540.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          30           1125           1392           3704
Jupyter Notebook                 6              0           3141            528
TeX                              1             10              0            181
reStructuredText                 5             79             85             66
YAML                             2              5              4             46
Markdown                         2             17              0             45
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
TOML                             1              0              0              6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            49           1248           4630           4611
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   149  astrobatty
    20  Attila Bódi

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 459

🔴 Failed to discover a Statement of need section in paper

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[dfm]

@astrobatty — Thanks for your submission! All the suitable JOSS editors are currently working at capacity so I'm going to "waitlist" this review until an editor with the relevant expertise is available to take it on. Thanks for your patience!

In the meantime, please add a section called "Statement of need" to your paper and then comment @editorialbot generate pdf on this thread.

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Maelstrom: A Python package for identifying companions to pulsating stars from their light travel time variations Submitting author: @danhey Handling editor: @mbobra (Active) Reviewers: @hpparvi, @mbobra Similarity score: 0.7624

clustertools: A Python Package for Analyzing Star Cluster Simulations Submitting author: @webbjj Handling editor: @christinahedges (Retired) Reviewers: @lwang-astro, @rieder Similarity score: 0.7585

stingray: A modern Python library for spectral timing Submitting author: @dhuppenkothen Handling editor: @arfon (Active) Reviewers: @Cadair Similarity score: 0.7558

ZodiPy: A Python package for zodiacal light simulations Submitting author: @MetinSa Handling editor: @dfm (Active) Reviewers: @dfm Similarity score: 0.7462

The Dusty Evolved Star Kit (DESK): A Python package for fitting the Spectral Energy Distribution of Evolved Stars Submitting author: @s-goldman Handling editor: @arfon (Active) Reviewers: @Deech08, @TomGoffrey Similarity score: 0.7437

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[astrobatty]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Maelstrom: A Python package for identifying companions to pulsating stars from their light travel time variations Submitting author: @danhey Handling editor: @mbobra (Active) Reviewers: @hpparvi, @mbobra Similarity score: 0.7590

stingray: A modern Python library for spectral timing Submitting author: @dhuppenkothen Handling editor: @arfon (Active) Reviewers: @Cadair Similarity score: 0.7551

clustertools: A Python Package for Analyzing Star Cluster Simulations Submitting author: @webbjj Handling editor: @christinahedges (Retired) Reviewers: @lwang-astro, @rieder Similarity score: 0.7551

DBSP_DRP: A Python package for automated spectroscopic data reduction of DBSP data Submitting author: @finagle29 Handling editor: @arfon (Active) Reviewers: @crhea93, @arjunsavel Similarity score: 0.7473

ZodiPy: A Python package for zodiacal light simulations Submitting author: @MetinSa Handling editor: @dfm (Active) Reviewers: @dfm Similarity score: 0.7441

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[astrobatty]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Maelstrom: A Python package for identifying companions to pulsating stars from their light travel time variations Submitting author: @danhey Handling editor: @mbobra (Active) Reviewers: @hpparvi, @mbobra Similarity score: 0.7632

clustertools: A Python Package for Analyzing Star Cluster Simulations Submitting author: @webbjj Handling editor: @christinahedges (Retired) Reviewers: @lwang-astro, @rieder Similarity score: 0.7565

stingray: A modern Python library for spectral timing Submitting author: @dhuppenkothen Handling editor: @arfon (Active) Reviewers: @Cadair Similarity score: 0.7565

DBSP_DRP: A Python package for automated spectroscopic data reduction of DBSP data Submitting author: @finagle29 Handling editor: @arfon (Active) Reviewers: @crhea93, @arjunsavel Similarity score: 0.7536

ZodiPy: A Python package for zodiacal light simulations Submitting author: @MetinSa Handling editor: @dfm (Active) Reviewers: @dfm Similarity score: 0.7470

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[warrickball]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @warrickball is now the editor

[warrickball]

@editorialbot add @keatonb as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@keatonb added to the reviewers list!

[warrickball]

@editorialbot add @darthoctopus as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@darthoctopus added to the reviewers list!

[warrickball]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/7118.