Open editorialbot opened 4 weeks ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- None
MISSING DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: An Improved Cellular Genetic Algorithm with Machin...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Machine coded genetic algorithms for real paramete...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems
- 10.5860/choice.27-0936 may be a valid DOI for title: Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Ma...
- 10.1016/b978-0-08-050684-5.50008-2 may be a valid DOI for title: A Comparative Analysis of Selection Schemes Used i...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The Genetic Algorithm and the Structure of the Fit...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution P...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Introduction to Evolutionary Computing
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Cellular genetic algorithms
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Cellular Genetic Algorithms
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Performance comparison of the specialized alpha ma...
- 10.17093/alphanumeric.576919 may be a valid DOI for title: Machine coded compact genetic algorithms for real ...
INVALID DOIs
- None
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.10 s (1815.3 files/s, 122405.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 156 1777 4254 4248
reStructuredText 16 348 667 386
Markdown 3 97 0 191
TeX 1 11 0 106
YAML 2 13 0 47
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
make 2 5 7 13
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 181 2259 4929 5017
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
113 SevgiAkten
81 sevgiakten
27 mhsatman@gmail.com
15 Mehmet Hakan Satman
5 jbytecode
2 Sevgi AKTEN KARAKAYA
2 Sevgi Akten
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 1202
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
✅ License found: MIT License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
CEGO: C++11 Evolutionary Global Optimization
Submitting author: @ianhbell
Handling editor: @jedbrown (Active)
Reviewers: @sarats, @sjvrijn, @mmenickelly
Similarity score: 0.6655
pyGOURGS - global optimization of n-ary tree representable problems using uniform random global search
Submitting author: @pySRURGS
Handling editor: @arokem (Retired)
Reviewers: @iljah, @nicoguaro
Similarity score: 0.6605
dcgp: Differentiable Cartesian Genetic Programming made easy.
Submitting author: @darioizzo
Handling editor: @VivianePons (Retired)
Reviewers: @Ohjeah, @shah314
Similarity score: 0.6590
Minimalist And Customisable Optimisation Package
Submitting author: @jbuisine
Handling editor: @melissawm (Retired)
Reviewers: @stsievert, @torressa
Similarity score: 0.6571
Metaheuristics: A Julia Package for Single- and Multi-Objective Optimization
Submitting author: @jmejia8
Handling editor: @vissarion (Active)
Reviewers: @idoby, @PaulDebus
Similarity score: 0.6496
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
@editorialbot check references
Checking the BibTeX entries failed with the following error:
Failed to parse BibTeX on value "%" (NAME) ["@", #<BibTeX::Entry >, {:title=>["An Improved Cellular Genetic Algorithm with Machine-Coded Operators for Real-Valued Optimisation Problems"], :author=>["Karakaya, Sevgi Akten and Satman, Mehmet Hakan"], :journal=>["Journal of Engineering Research and Applied Science"], :volume=>["13"], :number=>["1"], :pages=>["2500--2514"], :year=>["2024"]}]
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.5860/choice.27-0936 is OK
- 10.1016/b978-0-08-050684-5.50008-2 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-662-03315-9 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-662-44874-8 is OK
- 10.1007/978-0-387-77610-1_1 is OK
- 10.26468/trakyasobed.452095 is OK
- 10.17093/alphanumeric.576919 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: An Improved Cellular Genetic Algorithm with Machin...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Machine coded genetic algorithms for real paramete...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The Genetic Algorithm and the Structure of the Fit...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Cellular genetic algorithms
INVALID DOIs
- None
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
CEGO: C++11 Evolutionary Global Optimization
Submitting author: @ianhbell
Handling editor: @jedbrown (Active)
Reviewers: @sarats, @sjvrijn, @mmenickelly
Similarity score: 0.6670
pyGOURGS - global optimization of n-ary tree representable problems using uniform random global search
Submitting author: @pySRURGS
Handling editor: @arokem (Retired)
Reviewers: @iljah, @nicoguaro
Similarity score: 0.6625
dcgp: Differentiable Cartesian Genetic Programming made easy.
Submitting author: @darioizzo
Handling editor: @VivianePons (Retired)
Reviewers: @Ohjeah, @shah314
Similarity score: 0.6604
Minimalist And Customisable Optimisation Package
Submitting author: @jbuisine
Handling editor: @melissawm (Retired)
Reviewers: @stsievert, @torressa
Similarity score: 0.6587
Metaheuristics: A Julia Package for Single- and Multi-Objective Optimization
Submitting author: @jmejia8
Handling editor: @vissarion (Active)
Reviewers: @idoby, @PaulDebus
Similarity score: 0.6520
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
@editorialbot invite @JBorrow as editor
:wave: @JBorrow - want to edit this one?
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
@crvernon - I would like to participate as a reviewer on this one. Pls consider inviting me when review process is kicked off.
:wave: @JBorrow - just checking back in on this one...
👋 @JBorrow - want to edit this one?
@dineshchitlangia - thank you. Once I get a topic editor assigned to this submission, they can see if you can be used as a reviewer for this work. I appreciate you reaching out.
@editorialbot assign me as editor
Assigned! @JBorrow is now the editor
Hi @JBorrow, thank you for accepting to be an editor for our submission.
The editorial bot suggests some potential reviewers by the similarity measure so we can say
may be invited as reviewers to our submission.
I also investigated the list of people and
are suitable reviewers which have expertise on both Python and optimization.
Thank you in advance.
Hi @jmejia8, I noticed you were the author of a similar package submitted to JOSS. Would you be interested in reviewing this one for us? Our reviewer's guide is available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html
@JBorrow - Sure! I stay tuned.
@editorialbot add @jmejia8 as reviewer
@jmejia8 added to the reviewers list!
Hi @jonbmartin, I found your name in the JOSS reviewer's database. Would you be available to review this submission? Our reviewer's guide is available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html
Hi Josh,
I apologize, I am going to be quite busy for the next ~2 weeks, so I would prefer not to commit to reviewing now. If you are still looking for a reviewer at that time or need another round of reviews, I'd be happy to help then!
Jonathan
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 3:58 PM Josh Borrow @.***> wrote:
Hi @jonbmartin https://github.com/jonbmartin, I found your name in the JOSS reviewer's database. Would you be available to review this submission? Our reviewer's guide is available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/7105#issuecomment-2311082745, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKVCUT6IIDUNB6B2KQMHL2DZTOJG5AVCNFSM6AAAAABMSRLCLCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGMJRGA4DENZUGU . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
No worries, thank you for your quick reply!
Hi @vissarion, I found your name in the JOSS reviewer's database. Would you be available to review this submission? Our reviewer's guide is available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html
Hi @vissarion, I found your name in the JOSS reviewer's database. Would you be available to review this submission? Our reviewer's guide is available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html
Thanks for your message, unfortunately I have no time for reviewing.
Hi @mrava87, I found your name in the JOSS reviewer's database. Would you be available to review this submission? Our reviewer's guide is available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html
@JBorrow thank you for the invite but unfortunately the topic of the paper is a bit too far from my expertise. I will need to pass on this 😞
Hi @dc-luo, I found your name in the JOSS reviewer's database. Would you be available to review this submission? Our reviewer's guide is available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html
Hi @JBorrow, thank you for the invitation to review. Unfortunately I will be very busy until late October, so in the interest of not holding up the review, it'd be best that I pass for now. If you still need additional reviewers at that point (hopefully not!) I'd be happy to participate. Apologies for the inconvenience!
Hi @jbussemaker, I found your name in the JOSS reviewer's database. Would you be available to review this submission? Our reviewer's guide is available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html
@JBorrow I would be available for reviewing the paper from the 21st of October only unfortunately. If that's ok I'd be happy to be included as a reviewer.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@sevgiakten<!--end-author-handle-- (Sevgi AKTEN KARAKAYA) Repository: https://github.com/SevgiAkten/pycellga Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v0.2.1 Editor: !--editor-->@JBorrow<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: !--reviewers-list-->@jmejia8<!--end-reviewers-list-- Managing EiC: Chris Vernon
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @sevgiakten. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@sevgiakten if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: