[PRE REVIEW]: GWPopulation: Hardware agnostic population inference for compact binaries and beyond

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@ColmTalbot<!--end-author-handle-- (Colm Talbot) Repository: https://github.com/ColmTalbot/gwpopulation Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss-paper Version: v1.1.2 Editor: !--editor-->@plaplant<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Chris Vernon

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8ac773cf69ea9c4c195fc87dbd7cd955"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8ac773cf69ea9c4c195fc87dbd7cd955/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8ac773cf69ea9c4c195fc87dbd7cd955/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8ac773cf69ea9c4c195fc87dbd7cd955)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @ColmTalbot. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@ColmTalbot if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.07 s (949.4 files/s, 148557.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          29            969           1864           2891
Jupyter Notebook                 2              0           2864            295
YAML                             7             21              7            288
TeX                              1             21              0            278
Markdown                         5             70              0            239
reStructuredText                16             88            162             91
SVG                              4             38             20             90
make                             1              5              6             10
TOML                             1              1              0              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            66           1213           4923           4191
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   315  Colm Talbot
    11  jacobgolomb
     4  shanikagalaudage
     3  Shanika Galaudage
     2  HuiTong
     2  Jacob Golomb
     1  Chase Kimball
     1  afarah18

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 977

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041039 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevX.13.011048 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2404.04248 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4365/ab06fc is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/acb5ed is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/202347007 is OK
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2023/12/023 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.6323173 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/ad20eb is OK
- 10.1088/1361-6382/ac0b54 is OK
- 10.1086/670067 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.5654673 is OK
- 10.1017/pasa.2019.2 is OK
- 10.1007/978-981-15-4702-7_45-1 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.061102 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy pr...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: CuPy: A NumPy-Compatible Library for NVIDIA GPU Ca...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Bayesian Parametric Population Models

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf. Problem with affiliations for Shanika Galaudage, perhaps the affiliations index need quoting?.

[ColmTalbot]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

COMPAS: A rapid binary population synthesis suite Submitting author: @ilyamandel Handling editor: @christinahedges (Retired) Reviewers: @katiebreivik, @HeloiseS Similarity score: 0.7875

PyFstat: a Python package for continuous gravitational-wave data analysis Submitting author: @dbkeitel Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active) Reviewers: @khanx169, @RobertRosca Similarity score: 0.7816

Riroriro: Simulating gravitational waves and evaluating their detectability in Python Submitting author: @wvanzeist Handling editor: @dfm (Active) Reviewers: @GregoryAshton, @katiebreivik Similarity score: 0.7790

pygwb: a Python-based library for gravitational-wave background searches Submitting author: @a-renzini Handling editor: @plaplant (Active) Reviewers: @Sbozzolo, @cmbiwer Similarity score: 0.7425

CWInPy: A Python package for inference with continuous gravitational-wave signals from pulsars Submitting author: @mattpitkin Handling editor: @dfm (Active) Reviewers: @GregoryAshton, @ColmTalbot Similarity score: 0.7346

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[dfm]

@ColmTalbot — Thanks for your submission! All the suitable JOSS editors are currently working at capacity so I'm going to "waitlist" this review until an editor with the relevant expertise is available to take it on. Thanks for your patience!

[plaplant]

@editorialbot assign @plaplant as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @plaplant is now the editor

[plaplant]

@ColmTalbot thanks for your patience! I will be editing this submission. I'll begin by searching for suitable reviewers. As they agree to review, I will add them to this thread. If you have suggestions for potential reviewers, or any questions about the process, please let me know!