Open editorialbot opened 1 week ago
editorialbot
commented
1 week ago Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commandsFor example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdfReference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
✅ OK DOIs
- 10.1002/fld.3767 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cpc.2023.108700 is OK
- 10.1017/CBO9780511618604 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jcp.2023.112273 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compfluid.2024.106349 is OK
- 10.4208/cicp.291109.080410s is OK
- 10.1006/jcph.1996.0130 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cpc.2019.06.013 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.12.009 is OK
- 10.1137/S003614450036757X is OK
- 10.1137/S1064827595291819 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110246 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compfluid.2015.04.026 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cpc.2018.10.009 is OK
- 10.2514/1.J054580 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108063 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107262 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108527 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cpc.2023.108717 is OK
- 10.1063/5.0147457 is OK
- 10.1029/2023MS003732 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108453 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2404.12703 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.107906 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.06448 is OK
🟡 SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: HyPar Repository (https://github.com/debog/hypar)
❌ MISSING DOIs
- None
❌ INVALID DOIs
- 10.1177/10943420155768 is INVALID
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.07 s (801.6 files/s, 204144.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C 9 1058 402 3485
Python 19 929 739 2438
Markdown 14 534 0 1486
Jupyter Notebook 4 0 2687 618
TeX 1 41 0 266
C/C++ Header 10 146 119 221
make 1 17 29 36
YAML 2 1 4 24
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 60 2726 3980 8574
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Commit count by author:
299 Adrian
15 javier78ghPaper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1502
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section
editorialbot
commented
1 week ago License info:
🟡 License found: Other (Check here for OSI approval)
editorialbot
commented
1 week ago :point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
editorialbot
commented
1 week ago Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
RHEA: an open-source Reproducible Hybrid-architecture flow solver Engineered for Academia
Submitting author: @lluisjofre
Handling editor: @diehlpk (Active)
Reviewers: @ctdegroot, @thomasgillis
Similarity score: 0.8089
OpenCMP: An Open-Source Computational Multiphysics Package
Submitting author: @nasserma
Handling editor: @lucydot (Active)
Reviewers: @bonh, @WilkAndy
Similarity score: 0.7903
Ocellaris: a DG FEM solver for free-surface flows
Submitting author: @TormodLandet
Handling editor: @labarba (Retired)
Reviewers: @inducer, @piyueh
Similarity score: 0.7738
Coral: a parallel spectral solver for fluid dynamics and partial differential equations
Submitting author: @benmql
Handling editor: @eloisabentivegna (Retired)
Reviewers: @robertsawko, @rhaas80
Similarity score: 0.7627
PeleLMeX: an AMR Low Mach Number Reactive Flow Simulation Code without level sub-cycling
Submitting author: @esclapez
Handling editor: @kyleniemeyer (Active)
Reviewers: @mameehan5, @xzz105, @muellerm-pu
Similarity score: 0.7597
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
kyleniemeyer
commented
1 week ago Hello @navasmontilla, we will use this issue to assign an editor and find reviewers.
Before assigning an editor, I noticed that your project's README is extremely long, and seems to contain essentially all the documentation. I strongly recommend that you reduce the length of the README to basic overview and use/installation instructions, and create a dedicated documentation website/webpages. This will almost certainly be a request from reviewers.
kyleniemeyer
commented
1 week ago @navasmontilla can you please respond and address my above request? Otherwise, I will have to reject this for lack of response/activity. Thanks!
navasmontilla
commented
1 week ago Dear @kyleniemeyer,
I am sorry for the delay in my reply. I could not upload the proposed changes earlier. Following your instructions, I have reduced the length of the README file. It now includes an introduction, installation/use instructions, and the community guidelines and license. I have moved the section containing the example cases and the functionality documentation to other files and included the links to them in the README file
Please let me know if it is ok in its present form.
Thank you very much for your assistance.
Adrián
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@navasmontilla<!--end-author-handle-- (Adrian Navas Montilla) Repository: https://github.com/navasmontilla/CAELUM Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @navasmontilla. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@navasmontilla if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: