openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
720 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: PyRASA - Spectral parameterization in python based on IRASA #7382

Open editorialbot opened 2 days ago

editorialbot commented 2 days ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@schmidtfa<!--end-author-handle-- (Fabian Schmidt) Repository: https://github.com/schmidtfa/pyrasa Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b13e5cbfdf48d797bab112e533ab2274"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b13e5cbfdf48d797bab112e533ab2274/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b13e5cbfdf48d797bab112e533ab2274/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b13e5cbfdf48d797bab112e533ab2274)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @schmidtfa. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@schmidtfa if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 2 days ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 2 days ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.11 s (969.9 files/s, 287181.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          57           1713           1927           5252
SVG                              2              0              0           3832
Jupyter Notebook                14              0          17140           1264
YAML                             6              9              7            200
reStructuredText                21            231            222            198
Markdown                         4             75              0            166
TOML                             1             20              0            125
TeX                              1              7              0             77
CSS                              1              3              4             26
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
HTML                             1              2              4             12
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           110           2072          19312          11187
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   102  Thomas Hartmann
    75  Schmidt Fabian
    73  Fabi
     8  Fabian Schmidt
     2  b1059770
     2  dependabot[bot]
     2  schmidtfa
editorialbot commented 2 days ago

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 660

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot commented 2 days ago

License info:

✅ License found: BSD 2-Clause "Simplified" License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

editorialbot commented 2 days ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- None

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Parameterizing neural power spectra into periodic ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Array programming with NumPy

❌ MISSING DOIs

- 10.21105/joss.01272 may be a valid DOI for title: NeuroDSP: A package for neural digital signal proc...
- 10.37473/dac/10.1101/2021.10.15.464483 may be a valid DOI for title: Separating neural oscillations from aperiodic 1/f ...
- 10.1155/2011/156869 may be a valid DOI for title: FieldTrip: open source software for advanced analy...
- 10.1007/s10548-015-0448-0 may be a valid DOI for title: Separating fractal and oscillatory components in t...
- 10.7554/elife.70092 may be a valid DOI for title: An open-source, high-performance tool for automate...

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None
editorialbot commented 2 days ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 2 days ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Pycrostates: a Python library to study EEG microstates Submitting author: @vferat Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active) Reviewers: @AJQuinn, @vahid-sb, @tuliofalmeida, @anshu-97 Similarity score: 0.7609

NeuroDSP: A package for neural digital signal processing Submitting author: @voytek Handling editor: @arokem (Retired) Reviewers: @TomDLT Similarity score: 0.7529

Openseize: A digital signal processing package for large EEG datasets in Python Submitting author: @mscaudill Handling editor: @samhforbes (Active) Reviewers: @szorowi1, @AJQuinn Similarity score: 0.7422

MNE-ICALabel: Automatically annotating ICA components with ICLabel in Python Submitting author: @adam2392 Handling editor: @emdupre (Active) Reviewers: @TomDonoghue, @adswa Similarity score: 0.7401

Systole: A python package for cardiac signal synchrony and analysis Submitting author: @LegrandNico Handling editor: @osorensen (Active) Reviewers: @axel-loewe, @janfreyberg Similarity score: 0.7400

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.