Open adaisley opened 2 years ago
Do you have an example for how the index creation date vs the date string in the index name is causing a difference for you?
This other issue https://github.com/opensearch-project/index-management/issues/65 seems to present a use case. Index creation date is reset during reindexing, but using the date string in the index name would enable transitions based on the index creation date before reindexing, as long as that original index creation date was in the index name.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Currently, we use Curator to manage our Elasticsearch cluster. We're looking at migrating to Opensearch and checking through compatibility issues right now. We'd like to switch over to using ISM to manage our cluster's indexes, but we aren't quite sure it has the same functionality right now.
There are some index patterns that we use the creation time as the age of the index that we want to move to warm/delete. Most of the time though, we use the timestring on the index. This can be set using different Curator filters, such as https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/client/curator/current/fe_timestring.html and https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/client/curator/current/fe_use_age.html
Describe the solution you'd like When creating a Transition in ISM, under "Minimum index age" there should be an OPTIONAL option to use a timestring format which you specify, to decide on the transition trigger, instead of going off of what I believe is index creation time.
Describe alternatives you've considered We haven't managed to get one working, but a fork of Curator that is completely compatible with Opensearch would also be nice, though perhaps that option misses the point of moving forward and using ISM.
Additional context Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.