Closed ireneisdoomed closed 6 days ago
I think this issue could be/should modified depending on our logic for training the model. Lets make this decision as soon as we have credible set level feature matrix.
Can we close this issue?
@addramir we should still maintain old Gold standard somewhere (not exactly on the google bucket). I have done some of this as a part of https://github.com/opentargets/curation/pull/36, but wanted to wait for us to see if the last week workshop will result in some proper feedback on this.
I still consider it as some kind of static asset. We can curate it from sourse as a DAG or simply compile this file manually and store as static asset.
As a developer I want to have the raw L2G gold standard in the curation repo because it is a static file that is subject to versioning. Having it in the curation repo makes sense. It now lives in GCS, and moving it removes some overhead to deal with it in Gentropy.
Background
This file was initially maintained in its own repo https://github.com/opentargets/genetics-gold-standards/tree/master
Tasks