Closed SpriteOvO closed 1 year ago
I'm not sure if opkg has a mechanism for optional dependencies
it's quite limited by opkg, and i dont wanna add dirty trick to work around.
well, i dont see much reason to use v2ray over xray. in v2raya none of new transports are supported yet, but for uot, xray's xudp implementation is much popular (widely used) than v2fly's packetaddr, this is the main reason i choose xray for dependency. v2raya also perfers xray now.
if you like v2ray you may install v2raya with addtional argument --nodeps
(Do not follow dependencies).
BTW, the blue notice in the doc of
v2raya
is outdated and need to be updated as well.
yep, it's totally outdated. though i dont maintain this doc i may probably update it in the next few days (i'm busy now).
i've updated that doc, let's close it for now
Maintainer: @1715173329
Description:
Since
v2ray-core
package has been added in PR #19327, and bothv2ray-core
andxray-core
can be used as a dependency ofv2raya
, for now, I thinkv2raya
should not be forced to depend onxray-core
.I'm not sure if
opkg
has a mechanism for optional dependencies, however, I think there should be a way to let users to determine which-core
package to be installed only and used.BTW, the blue notice in the doc of
v2raya
is outdated and need to be updated as well.