fix: Fix Swift 5.7 toolchain support

[hassila]

Workaround https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/60876 so we can build with Swift 5.7 again

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Merging #149 (0f41138) into main (46348d8) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is 95.50%.

Additional details and impacted files

[](https://codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/149?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #149 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 78.66% 78.66% ======================================= Files 25 25 Lines 2695 2695 ======================================= Hits 2120 2120 Misses 575 575 ``` | [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/149?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [...stemStats/OperatingSystemStatsProducer+Linux.swift](https://codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/149?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one#diff-U291cmNlcy9CZW5jaG1hcmsvT3BlcmF0aW5nU3lzdGVtU3RhdHMvT3BlcmF0aW5nU3lzdGVtU3RhdHNQcm9kdWNlcitMaW51eC5zd2lmdA==) | `94.89% <95.50%> (ø)` | | | [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/149?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [...stemStats/OperatingSystemStatsProducer+Linux.swift](https://codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/149?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one#diff-U291cmNlcy9CZW5jaG1hcmsvT3BlcmF0aW5nU3lzdGVtU3RhdHMvT3BlcmF0aW5nU3lzdGVtU3RhdHNQcm9kdWNlcitMaW51eC5zd2lmdA==) | `94.89% <95.50%> (ø)` | | ------ [Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry](https://codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/149?src=pr&el=continue&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one). > **Legend** - [Click here to learn more](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/codecov-delta?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one) > `Δ = absolute (impact)`, `ø = not affected`, `? = missing data` > Powered by [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/149?src=pr&el=footer&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one). Last update [46348d8...0f41138](https://codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/149?src=pr&el=lastupdated&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one). Read the [comment docs](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/pull-request-comments?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one).

[github-actions[bot]]

Pull request benchmark comparison [ubuntu-latest] with 'main' run at 2023-04-17T15:41:47+00:00 Pull request had performance regressions