Closed pradeepgudipati closed 6 months ago
Please do not double report your issues. It won't make it more likely that you get an answer.
Closing as duplicate and for missing any usable description of the problem.
Dear @lonvia, I don't think it's double reporting of an issue. Originally, I have posted this as a discussion. Since then more people have reported the same problem which makes it worth to turn it into an issue, I believe. My Issue was already closed before (it included the full description btw), now this one from @pradeepgudipati. If you believe it will get the same amount of attention from contributors in Discussions I am happy leaving it there. But otherwise, I would like to move it to Issues. What do you think is the correct procedure to do that? Thank you very much for your time and for any reply!
No, the issue will not get more attention when it is endlessly duplicated. Rather the opposite.
I am not sure whether we understand each other. So you are saying you treat both Discussion and Issue as an Issue? Because at no point in time there was a duplication of any Issue on this topic. Cheers
@kubatjak , @pradeepgudipati
Please, instead of repeatedly bringing up a one-year-old, poorly documented issue without new information, invest your energy in debugging the problem and demonstrate your genuine interest in finding a solution.
For example, this program should work:
@ImreSamu 😀 😀 😀 thank you
Thank you guys for the great responses.
If we were as smart as you guys we would be on your team and contributing to making this library better.
If you guys need help debugging this issue, you could have also just asked. There is no mention of help required anywhere and the documentation is very poor.
Feels like a proper conspiracy running to keep osm down.
And this issue really is kicking some a**
Here are more details.
https://github.com/osmcode/pyosmium/discussions/233