Closed PeterDaveHello closed 6 years ago
It would also be worth testing with pngcrush
and optipng
and comparing the results.
@nodiscc by my experience, zopflipng usually has better results than optipng.
31449 zopfli
41857 optipng
41848 pngcrush
44541 unoptimized
:+1:
@AdamWhitcroft Can this be merged?
It would be worth comparing against PNGs compressed with https://github.com/Kilian/Trimage, for completeness sake
This branch is old.
apaxy has been transferred to a new team and we're trying to do the housework between all pending issues and pull requests.
We decided to close this pull request. Please reclaim if you want this pull request to be re-opened, discussed and reviewed again.
@oupala yes please, I can update the branch.
In fact, we plan to replace all icons by other icons (see #86, #103). As a consequence, there no real need to optimize existing images.
That's why we wanted to close this pull request.
@chrisssycollins could pay attention to optimize image of your new set of icons?
@oupala I'll make sure they are fully optimised.
Using Google's zopflipng to compress the png images losslessly, this one has better result than #49.