Open larsyencken opened 5 months ago
Blocked on:
From discussion: we could also consider a gradual migration, e.g. enabling pyarrow types for new datasets rather than applying it over everything.
We could also bench the performance gains to see if they're worth it.
Pablo noted that adding commitments to our future selves can mean that "small" data updates can expand. We should try to make more things as automatic as possible.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
Don't close it. We should at least compare the performance (CPU & mem) of current repacking vs new pyarrow dtypes.
(While looking into this and trying to optimize reading the table, I discovered that loading is actually really fast (<1s), but setting primary key as an index is slow.)
Context
We do frame repacking to make our data frames smaller on disk and faster to work with. It has some slight annoyances, such as making more variables categorical, which complicates group-bys, for example.
What
With Pandas 2.2, we have the option to change our frame repacking to use new pyarrow data types, which are supposed to be much more efficient.
That would also bring our data catalog into compatibility with more of the data ecosystem (e.g. Polars, Nushell and friends).