Closed seankimkdy closed 4 months ago
310 tests +1 310 :white_check_mark: +1 3s :stopwatch: -1s 49 suites ±0 0 :zzz: ±0 1 files ±0 0 :x: ±0
Results for commit 305fc58b. ± Comparison against base commit e61c0ba2.
:recycle: This comment has been updated with latest results.
For the detailed report, please go to Checks tab
, click Build and Test
, and then download unit_test_coverage
artifact at the bottom of build page.
The coverage result does not include the functional test results.
For the detailed report, please go to Checks tab
, click Build and Test
, and then download unit_test_coverage
artifact at the bottom of build page.
The coverage result does not include the functional test results.
For the detailed report, please go to Checks tab
, click Build and Test
, and then download unit_test_coverage
artifact at the bottom of build page.
The coverage result does not include the functional test results.
For the detailed report, please go to Checks tab
, click Build and Test
, and then download unit_test_coverage
artifact at the bottom of build page.
The coverage result does not include the functional test results.
Takes on GCP portion of #434. The NAT gateway requires a cloud router like the VPN gateway we use for multicloud connections. I've chosen to share the router between these two functionalities as GCP says there's no issues as long as BGP is not shared.
(see https://cloud.google.com/network-connectivity/docs/router/how-to/create-router-vpc-network#establish_bgp_sessions)
Other minor things include a refactor of GCP connectivity test methods.