Add support for multi-arch Docker images

[nitisht]

We need to add support for multi-arch images

https://docs.docker.com/desktop/extensions-sdk/extensions/multi-arch/

[nitisht]

@Mayon-Francis are you working on this still?

[TheoIsDumb]

I would like to work on this issue. So, could you please assign this to me?

[nitisht]

Hi @Theofrid sure. Just to be clear, the issue regarding support for multi-arch images for the Parseable Docker Image

[hyperreal64]

I would like to work on this issue. So, could you please assign this to me?

Any progress on this yet? :-)

[TheoIsDumb]

Yeah, I am still working on it. It took me a little bit of time to understand the issue, but I am making progress.

On Tue, Nov 29, 2022, 19:03 Jeffrey Serio @.***> wrote:

I would like to work on this issue. So, could you please assign this to me?

Any progress on this yet? :-)

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/parseablehq/parseable/issues/163#issuecomment-1330658912, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A4KMJWJG5LXIWYQTRAP5QP3WKYAZBANCNFSM6AAAAAARDMWYL4 . You are receiving this because you were assigned.Message ID: @.***>

[TheoIsDumb]

I have a doubt. The alpine docker image variant only support two architectures, that is amd64 and arm64/v8. So, should I have to switch to other docker image variants like latest or slim-buster in order to implement support for other architectures too?

[nitisht]

Hey @Theofrid for now, if we can support amd64 and arm64 for standard OS (windows, macOS, Linux) I think we're good.

[TheoIsDumb]

~ + docker buildx build --platform linux/amd64 --tag parseable/rust:1.65-alpine3.16 --push .

I ran this command and there was a compiling error and I am not sure what to do with this.

[nitisht]

cc @trueleo

[nitisht]

also @Theofrid would you mind joining our slack we can discuss and see how to fix this

[trueleo]

@Theofrid I am not sure why this is happening on rust 1.65 image .. I will check Minimum Support Rust Version for zstd and packages depending on it.

[syepes]

@nitisht | @trueleo What platforms would you guys like to target? In one of my projects I managed to have cross compiled images but it was not the easiest thing, also not all dependencies work on all platforms :-(

Hope this could serve you as a reference: https://github.com/syepes/sio2prom/blob/a4c751b366e30969dc13e04bd4f97dda501f66b3/.github/workflows/release.yml#L15

[nitisht]

Hey @syepes I was thinking of atleast linux/arm64 for now. The workflow file looks a good idea, let me try this out today. Thanks for the pointer!

[teddybee]

It would be good to have ARM64 images, there are lots of servers now.

[Eshanatnight]

Hi Everyone, This is an old Issue so if this is a spam I apologize, but I was able to build the image for linux/arm64 and linux/amd64, on branch main.

So it works, from my research the c foreign file interface was stabilized in November/December 2022.

docker buildx build --push --tag <tagname> --platform linux/arm64,linux/amd64 .\

Docker version 24.0.7 build hash afdd53b

[nitisht]

This is great @Eshanatnight , can you send a PR to the github actions so this image is automatically built and pushed to dockerhub.

[Eshanatnight]

Sure. I'll do it in a moment.