search

patched-codes / patchwork

Automate code reviews, patching and documentation with self-hosted LLM workflows.
https://patched.codes
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
1.14k stars 74 forks source link

Auto fix json output from LLMs #1000

Closed CTY-git closed 3 weeks ago

CTY-git commented 3 weeks ago

Currently we are seeing malformed JSON output from gemini models, we will use json-repair to make an attempt to fix the Json output instead of throwing the results out entirely.

patched-admin commented 3 weeks ago
The pull request review highlights several areas of concern and recommendations. Firstly, there are potential bugs with the method `__handle_modified_code_files` as it unconditionally overwrites `self.inputs['modified_code_files']`, which could lead to unintended data loss if it has been populated elsewhere. Secondly, while the code adheres to existing coding standards, particularly in spacing and method naming, it lacks explanatory comments that could provide clarity on certain initializations. Security is a prominent theme, as the use of the `repair_json` function from the `json_repair` library without thorough examination could introduce vulnerabilities, especially if handling untrusted JSON sources. It is also recommended that security reviews be conducted for the new dependencies, due to concerns over potential CVEs and compatibility issues. Lastly, attention is drawn to the version update from `0.0.76` to `0.0.77`, with a reminder that even minor version changes can introduce significant implications if not carefully scrutinized for breaking changes. Thorough testing, detailed security evaluations, and adherence to semantic versioning are advised before the pull request is approved for merging. ------
* File changed: [patchwork/steps/PR/PR.py](https://github.com/patched-codes/patchwork/pull/1000/files#diff-3170c8da7925b4e4d70e399d5f31d29beeda75c57ca1b7a330b3865a0351748e) 1. **Potential Bugs**: - The initialization of `self.inputs['modified_code_files']` to an empty list is done unconditionally every time the method `__handle_modified_code_files` is called. This can overwrite existing data unexpectedly if `self.inputs['modified_code_files']` has been populated elsewhere before this method is called. 2. **Coding Standards**: - The addition seems to follow the original coding style in terms of spacing and line placement. However, there is no comment explaining why `modified_code_files` must be initialized here, which could help in understanding the reason for this change. 3. **Security Vulnerabilities**: - The modification does not introduce direct security vulnerabilities since it only initializes a field in the `inputs` attribute. - However, depending on how `modified_code_files` is used elsewhere in the code, if its initialization is unintended, it could affect the application flow or data accuracy, indirectly creating a security concern especially if it impacts data integrity.
* File changed: [patchwork/steps/SimplifiedLLM/SimplifiedLLM.py](https://github.com/patched-codes/patchwork/pull/1000/files#diff-f73ff142d98861fb66a6eebbfcfc772506c4ea9fe26336704a4135bd7c57e2b3) 1. **Potential Bugs**: - The newly introduced `__json_loads` method relies on the `json_repair` package's `repair_json` function for handling JSON decode errors. If there are unexpected issues with `repair_json`, such as failing to sufficiently correct the malformed JSON, it could still lead to subsequent errors when attempting to load the repaired string. 2. **Security Vulnerabilities**: - The code modification uses `repair_json` which could potentially introduce a security vulnerability if the JSON input source is untrusted or can contain arbitrary data. If there are logic flaws within `repair_json` that could be exploited, it might lead to parsing of unintended data formats. It's essential to ensure that `repair_json` itself is thoroughly evaluated for security implications since it's dealing with malformed JSON that could include malicious content. 3. **Adherence to Coding Standards**: - The updated method name `__json_loads` is consistent with the internal Python method naming convention using double underscore for private methods. However, consider if there are specific naming conventions detailed in the project's coding standards document that might suggest other naming or structuring practices. - Import statements for the newly added `json_repair` should be structured and ordered according to PEP 8 (e.g., grouped together in third-party imports and separated with newline from standard library imports), though this might already be the case here as `import json` is maintained at the top. Recommendation: Conduct a security review of the `repair_json` library to ensure it doesn't introduce vulnerabilities, especially regarding how it handles potentially mal-formed or malicious JSON data inputs.
* File changed: [pyproject.toml](https://github.com/patched-codes/patchwork/pull/1000/files#diff-50c86b7ed8ac2cf95bd48334961bf0530cdc77b5a56f852c5c61b89d735fd711) The modifications in the `pyproject.toml` file introduce new dependencies (`json-repair`, `opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-grpc`, `onnxruntime`). It is crucial to check whether these additions are necessary and scrutinize them for potential security vulnerabilities, such as known CVEs associated with these versions or lack of maturity in their development cycle. Additionally, since version updates for other dependencies such as `torch`, `orjson`, and others are specified, a check on their compatibility and security should be done in parallel. Eye should also be kept on the adherence of semantic versioning. The update from version `0.0.76` to `0.0.77` denotes a patch release. Typically, a patch release implies bug fixes and slight modifications that don’t introduce breaking changes. Any dependencies that potentially introduce a breaking change should be evaluated further, ensuring such changes align with the expected stability implied by the version bump. Regarding coding standards, comments have been uniformly added for the 'rag' section which improves clarity around purpose of the versioning: pinning transitive dependencies. It would be advisable to review the impact of these dependencies in the broader codebase for any inconsistencies in implementation. Overall, thorough testing and due diligence around security and compatibility impact areas are recommended before merging this pull request.