Closed Randl closed 3 months ago
Modulo failing tests -- not sure what's going on with those (?) -- this LGTM. Once the tests are fixed we can check the Optimistix and Diffrax tests on this PR before merging it, and see if anything looks awry.
Should we bump the version since this is a potentially breaking change?
Yes, I think we should.
I can see that tests now pass -- are you happy with this PR / should I merge it?
I think I am.
Though one possibility to consider is to not do conjugation in tree_dot
at all but rater leave it to caller, similarly to jnp.dot
. This may clutter downstream code but will be consistent with the Jax/numpy semantics.
Merged, then! And that's an interesting idea. In particular given the difficulties we faced in https://github.com/patrick-kidger/optimistix/pull/61, I can see that that might simplify things.
The decision is yours -- I'd be happy to make that change if you think that is what is best.
It may break something downstream unfortunately, so updating dependencies should be done carefully