Closed Que-tin closed 1 year ago
My array naming algorithm is as follows:
absenceManagerId
absenceManagerIds
😁
I think both absenceManagerIds
and absenceManagersIds
make sense since it's a n:n relationship. But not absenceManagersId
because it's missing the fact that it's an array of ids :)
Naming wont be changes as of now.
But its the an array of ids of multiple managers.
absenceManagerIds
sounds like a single manager could have multiple ids.So I'd say first is correct even tho I agree it sounds a bit odd.
P.s. I don't have rights to merge stuff.