Closed philbarker closed 10 months ago
Unsurprisingly we are more similar to CEDS.
http://specification.sifassociation.org/Implementation/NA/4.3/CommonTypes.html#obj:PhoneNumberType
FYI
Keep country code and extension.
Combine area code and phone number into one, call it: phoneNumber
, and make sure definition gets changed to reflect this.
No need for expiration date as have start and end date for contact.
Should consider relevance of phone numbers in the long term, but definitely keep it as part of transcript.
I kept the max length of phoneNumber
to 11digits, but note that China, Brazil and some other countries have 12 or 13 digit numbers (ref)
We have
We break the telephone number down into parts (country prefix, area code, number, extension)
CEDS draft Ontology has
As far as I can see CEDS draft ontology
CTDL (which we use for the other contact details) has telephone and fax as properties of ContactPoint (so no class for Telephone / FAX details), with simple strings as the expected value.
Mapping
Possibilities
To keep the breakdown of the phone number (which seems useful): use the CTDL properties to link ContactPoint to an object with type drawn from CEDS, and keep the PESC properties to specify the number.
Or
Simplify, don't bother with the breakdown of the phone number, and just use CTDL properties in the ContactPoint.