Open seabbs opened 2 months ago
Thanks for the update @seabbs ! Apologies if we misinterpreted EpiNow2
, we did this assessment based on the available documentation at the time. Fully agree with your comments about the trickiness of stating what packages can "do" at a given time...
No worries at all. I think probably there needs to be some kind of living review/benchmark etc that lives somewhere independent and that people submit to. Would be a pretty cool collaboration.
Hi! Really looking forward to checking this out in detail!
I was just skimming the associated paper (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0305550) and saw this:
About EpiNow2. Unfortunately, it's not very well documented it can handle non-daily reporting processes. I think we spoke a little about this before when it was possible but required just throwing it at the model and fitting to it which we did a lot of during COVID-19 (not sure I would characterise that as requiring expert knowledge as per the table but hard to say!). Now it's a fully supported feature (https://epiforecasts.io/EpiNow2/reference/obs_opts.html - see the docs for the na arg). I'd be keen to see how this compares to what you are doing.
Sam
P.S I think this probably links to it being tricky to define what a software package can "do" when they all keep changing. I don't know what a good solution to this is aside from making sure to reference the explicit version being talked about but even then really hard.