Closed jia57b closed 3 weeks ago
Tested again with story version v0.12.1-f20525a
, after I wait some minutes (about 200 blocks) after the second node joined consensus, the validator node is in jail (so I couldn't see it being jailed last time, maybe because the waiting time was not enough), I tried to call unjail and it cannot unjail. But evidence
in the api is empty, I'm not sure if it's expected.
Tested in singularity, the validator isn't jailed and no find evidence of DuplicateVoteEvidence, after singularity (3000 height), the validator is jailed and cannot be unjailed.
Response of http://
"evidence": {
"evidence": [
{
"type": "tendermint/DuplicateVoteEvidence",
"value": {
"vote_a": {
"type": 1,
"height": "3004",
"round": 0,
"block_id": {
"hash": "32B37CB40D41FD65D7CF92353A81BCF512B712DA91411A2EA07CE1B19DEE0008",
"parts": {
"total": 1,
"hash": "DBACBCE52CA66ED02137CD3D684A060EBB58DF67AC46F60B034302525451EF0D"
}
},
"timestamp": "2024-11-01T12:54:18.327910945Z",
"validator_address": "7DF70B816E08B614AB7F6329AB76197ABF7F2548",
"validator_index": 0,
"signature": "lJZY9DPSaY7MCJVovIjMTqe//lwopzTVWUFGz6C8nE0O4ltGjpK2bvlr5orDXNvOtIqa5zWM1+vpLjTVUXQV9Q==",
"extension": null,
"extension_signature": null
},
"vote_b": {
"type": 1,
"height": "3004",
"round": 0,
"block_id": {
"hash": "E8C831E627347F97534AC0B1B7536CCCAB1502CD61BABC40DEF0FF1141039DC5",
"parts": {
"total": 1,
"hash": "C4E9AEFC24A05A810CBBFAD13C449A1DE522F480F42AD9AB8E8D6B35B9387FAB"
}
},
"timestamp": "2024-11-01T12:54:18.386590247Z",
"validator_address": "7DF70B816E08B614AB7F6329AB76197ABF7F2548",
"validator_index": 0,
"signature": "X8oDglRfBeC1FI9bIlA2iS3kuDuHNHZ0QwRBMLDMOcBa05CeRu6Vl01he2lUiUrKoTnWV0i+sQlWc45upq5Gnw==",
"extension": null,
"extension_signature": null
},
"TotalVotingPower": "9000000",
"ValidatorPower": "5000000",
"Timestamp": "2024-11-01T12:54:16.548324932Z"
}
}
]
},
http://
{
"operator_address": "storyvaloper10hmshqtwpzmpf2mlvv56kase02lh7f2g7p6j6y",
"consensus_pubkey": {
"type": "tendermint/PubKeySecp256k1",
"value": "A4uHWIRA8zraUxBaFGyoDhJJCYi4OPz1w5j+lIc37gx1"
},
"jailed": true,
"status": 1,
"tokens": "4750000000000",
"delegator_shares": "5000000000000.000000000000000000",
"description": {
"moniker": "non-validator-01-create"
},
"unbonding_height": "3005",
"unbonding_time": "2024-11-01T12:54:28.556156678Z",
"commission": {
"commission_rates": {
"rate": "0.100000000000000000",
"max_rate": "0.500000000000000000",
"max_change_rate": "0.010000000000000000"
},
"update_time": "2024-11-01T11:19:35.205488297Z"
},
"min_self_delegation": "1024",
"unbonding_ids": [
"1"
],
"rewards_tokens": "2375000000000.000000000000000000",
"delegator_rewards_shares": "2500000000000.000000000000000000"
},
Tested mininet with story version: v0.12.2-unstable-e6d2d51
Test 1:
Test 2:
@jia57b Thanks for your testing! We also need to test double signing in the singularity with the same key of genesis validator.
Tested double signing on the genesis validator in the singularity:
validator4 logs:
Nov 05 03:09:54 ip-172-31-10-69.us-west-1.compute.internal cosmovisor[1522874]: 24-11-05 03:09:54.941 ERRO found conflicting vote from ourselves; did you unsafe_reset a validator? module=consensus height=50 round=0 type=SIGNED_MSG_TYPE_PREVOTE
Nov 05 03:09:54 ip-172-31-10-69.us-west-1.compute.internal cosmovisor[1522874]: 24-11-05 03:09:54.941 ERRO failed to process message module=consensus height=50 round=0 peer=d86e7d2995f3cfde015c51eed474166fa76ab7b6 msg_type=*consensus.VoteMessage err="conflicting votes from validator EAEDE127412F3122AB3D905B5796591B196AB703"
validator4 API:
"evidence": [
{
"type": "tendermint/DuplicateVoteEvidence",
"value": {
"vote_a": {
"type": 1,
"height": "48",
"round": 0,
"block_id": {
"hash": "1698C9A53F5B882FF8F2514DC8EE648404E87DCC562EA647946E9F67A0415818",
"parts": {
"total": 1,
"hash": "167063A58EA9DB50EA69E92EE2FCE72EF6496B6017B1EAE5DF31479D9CBA2507"
}
},
"timestamp": "2024-11-05T03:09:50.848782433Z",
"validator_address": "EAEDE127412F3122AB3D905B5796591B196AB703",
"validator_index": 3,
"signature": "Y1CzqPe2kPYDsl1tHmoUrPiMy85k/qDBEiul4vUFhSlh7DYZxssUYbfW2hQGLPZrbewh7Z0I75L4Fo9baMytBQ==",
"extension": null,
"extension_signature": null
},
"vote_b": {
"type": 1,
"height": "48",
"round": 0,
"block_id": {
"hash": "3C12750B191299E93335BD927E92CDD020084D5B1063C55721112D00B82EB2F1",
"parts": {
"total": 1,
"hash": "AD06B9D1F17EEB86095377CE64EA42E5EF56014B6D630F8FB3DD4E36422E81DD"
}
},
"timestamp": "2024-11-05T03:09:50.871611979Z",
"validator_address": "EAEDE127412F3122AB3D905B5796591B196AB703",
"validator_index": 3,
"signature": "7qeBPqNixohq+0fiP1/Z3eYHP3XKVVk6K9oYS4fuB2cKEgMj8NEqcXbAtepnqH9iHGu3o9mFbWxvKrhXN0vRfA==",
"extension": null,
"extension_signature": null
},
"TotalVotingPower": "4000000",
"ValidatorPower": "1000000",
"Timestamp": "2024-11-05T03:09:49.121613003Z"
}
}
]
test node logs:
24-11-05 03:09:54.807 ERRO prevote step: consensus deems this block invalid; prevoting nil module=consensus height=50 round=0 err="wrong Block.Header.AppHash. Expected E897607598962F9929E88CDCB5BD03AB505F36218B1FD99C839C9CEAFD8C5885, got 1C874E2361FBCAB5D65547BF4150A8ABDD4C34139B2186CCA418F0008E2C30D0"
24-11-05 03:09:54.922 ERRO found conflicting vote from ourselves; did you unsafe_reset a validator? module=consensus height=50 round=0 type=SIGNED_MSG_TYPE_PREVOTE
24-11-05 03:09:54.922 ERRO failed to process message module=consensus height=50 round=0 peer=0d132ae896ae4d2823ed143bfcce9edc572a5fa3 msg_type=*consensus.VoteMessage err="conflicting votes from validator EAEDE127412F3122AB3D905B5796591B196AB703"
24-11-05 03:09:54.925 ERRO CONSENSUS FAILURE!!! module=consensus err="precommit step; +2/3 prevoted for an invalid block: wrong Block.Header.AppHash. Expected E897607598962F9929E88CDCB5BD03AB505F36218B1FD99C839C9CEAFD8C5885, got 1C874E2361FBCAB5D65547BF4150A8ABDD4C34139B2186CCA418F0008E2C30D0"
test node API:
"evidence": [
{
"type": "tendermint/DuplicateVoteEvidence",
"value": {
"vote_a": {
"type": 1,
"height": "48",
"round": 0,
"block_id": {
"hash": "1698C9A53F5B882FF8F2514DC8EE648404E87DCC562EA647946E9F67A0415818",
"parts": {
"total": 1,
"hash": "167063A58EA9DB50EA69E92EE2FCE72EF6496B6017B1EAE5DF31479D9CBA2507"
}
},
"timestamp": "2024-11-05T03:09:50.848782433Z",
"validator_address": "EAEDE127412F3122AB3D905B5796591B196AB703",
"validator_index": 3,
"signature": "Y1CzqPe2kPYDsl1tHmoUrPiMy85k/qDBEiul4vUFhSlh7DYZxssUYbfW2hQGLPZrbewh7Z0I75L4Fo9baMytBQ==",
"extension": null,
"extension_signature": null
},
"vote_b": {
"type": 1,
"height": "48",
"round": 0,
"block_id": {
"hash": "3C12750B191299E93335BD927E92CDD020084D5B1063C55721112D00B82EB2F1",
"parts": {
"total": 1,
"hash": "AD06B9D1F17EEB86095377CE64EA42E5EF56014B6D630F8FB3DD4E36422E81DD"
}
},
"timestamp": "2024-11-05T03:09:50.871611979Z",
"validator_address": "EAEDE127412F3122AB3D905B5796591B196AB703",
"validator_index": 3,
"signature": "7qeBPqNixohq+0fiP1/Z3eYHP3XKVVk6K9oYS4fuB2cKEgMj8NEqcXbAtepnqH9iHGu3o9mFbWxvKrhXN0vRfA==",
"extension": null,
"extension_signature": null
},
"TotalVotingPower": "4000000",
"ValidatorPower": "1000000",
"Timestamp": "2024-11-05T03:09:49.121613003Z"
}
}
]
Attach logs after restart validator04. val04.log
Description and context
Tested on devnet (after singularity), validator isn't jailed after double sign
Steps to reproduce
Experienced behavior
Both of the two nodes can produce blocks and the validator isn't jailed.
Expected behavior
validator should be removed from active validator set and cannot unjail it.