Open michaelweylandt opened 1 month ago
@plnrbrt @michaelweylandt There is currently no submission of the 2nd mini project committed to github, The url https://plnrbrt.github.io/STA9750-2024-FALL/mp02.html is broken.
@plnrbrt The link is 404 not found and I did not find the mp02.qmd code on the repository.
@plnrbrt I see it 404 too
Hello everyone, my website is finally working! Would love to get your feedbacks if you have some time to check it out. @whaleron @aaronkcooper @haolinnn @michaelweylandt
You have one of the best layouts I’ve seen so far and you tell the story! Written Communication: 10/10 You had intro, walked through each question and concluded with cool poster and your reflections about the topic.
Project Skeleton: 10/10 Collapsed code supported with a text and looks neat. Everything is ordered and no room for improvement.
Formatting and Display: 8/10 Good job on visuals only one suggestion to make less crowded chart for “percentage change in successful movies by genre over decades” pick less genres to have less lines.
Code Quality: 10/10 Code outputs are correct, and all looks good.
Data Preparation: 10/10
I had to take some points out as this was a late submission. But I'm happy for you that you nailed the project 👍
Total Grade: 45/50 Nice job!
Thanks @plnrbrt !
Peer Feedback:
It is now time for the peer feedback round for Mini-Project 02. Please review @plnrbrt's submission for this mini-project and provide peer feedback.
Using the rubric at https://michael-weylandt.com/STA9750/miniprojects/mini02.html#rubric, please grade their submission out of a total of 50 points. Note that this rubric is slightly different than that used for Mini-Project 01.
For each of the five categories, please give them a separate score and provide a total (sum) score across the entire assignment. Feel free to assign extra credit if you feel it is warranted (following the rubric).
If you give a score of less than 5 for any category, please provide a suggestion for improvement. (You can also give suggestions for any element they did well - more feedback is always great!)
As you go through this peer feedback exercise, think about what you particularly like about this submission and how you can incorporate that approach in your future work. If something is particularly insightful or creative, give some kudos!
Evaluators: This should take you around 15 minutes per peer feedback. You are not required to engage in substantial back-and-forth with @plnrbrt, but you are of course welcome to initiate a discussion.
@plnrbrt: please engage fully with your peers. They are here to help you!
Submission URL should be: https://plnrbrt.github.io/STA9750-2024-FALL/mp02.html
Feel free to link to other repos, the course documentation, or other useful examples.
Thanks! @michaelweylandt
CC: @charles-ramirez