poppopjmp / shedskin

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/shedskin
0 stars 0 forks source link

exporting inferred types (to cython or otherwise) #122

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
this feature has two uses:

the first is for future use when an import feature is also written, so that 
multipe runes with only small changes take significantly less time.

the second is to be able to integrate the new output with other python 
'compilers' that benefit from some sort of typing but can't infer them, such as 
cython. It may be possible that adding (at least) partial inferred types to 
cython can create output that's much more capable (cython handles any library) 
while gaining as much speed benefit as possible.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by fahh...@gmail.com on 15 Dec 2010 at 3:30

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
thanks for the suggestion. I fully agree this would be a nice thing to have.. 
though it seemed more important before 0.6, because I wasn't sure scalability 
would be good enough without it. perhaps if there's this 10,000 line program 
that I cannot get shedskin to analyze within a reasonable amount of time, I 
will look into it again.. the largest current example program (c64 emulator) 
compiles in a few minutes, probably within one minute with some minor 
improvements and a fast CPU in a few years.. 

a related approach would be to just profile a program, and store type 
information for use in inference or code generation. that would also make it 
faster to analyze a large program for the first time, so I think this is a 
better approach. in the newsgroup I posted a simple example that shows a useful 
profiler can probably be written in a few hundred lines of code. it would be 
very nice to have an independent project that allows to store this information 
in some standard format, for use in any python implementation (if there isn't 
one already). perhaps shedskin could then also output to this format. it's 
probalby not something I will work on myself though.

Original comment by mark.duf...@gmail.com on 15 Dec 2010 at 9:41

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Issue 134 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by mark.duf...@gmail.com on 16 Jul 2011 at 9:54

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by mark.duf...@gmail.com on 16 Jul 2011 at 9:55