Closed progfolio closed 1 year ago
I don't agree with checkdoc's idea of documenting cl-defmethod
excessively. The type information comes from the next argument, which is also self-explanatory. Transient itself also does not use this style. Remaining nits accounted for in inbound changes.
I wouldn't consider it excessive documentation. The name obj
is too generic IMO. It could be replaced with a more specific description of what the object represents. That would make it naturally fit in the docstring as well. To each their own, though.
checkdoc reports the following: