projectdiscovery / nuclei

Fast and customizable vulnerability scanner based on simple YAML based DSL.
https://docs.projectdiscovery.io/tools/nuclei
MIT License
20.33k stars 2.48k forks source link

[BUG] Missing output "[INF] No results found. Better luck next time!" when using nuclei 3.3.4 #5740

Open daffainfo opened 2 days ago

daffainfo commented 2 days ago

Is there an existing issue for this?

Current Behavior

daffainfo@root nuclei-templates % nuclei -u http://example/ -thttp/cves/2024/CVE-2024-38473.yaml

                     __     _
   ____  __  _______/ /__  (_)
  / __ \/ / / / ___/ / _ \/ /
 / / / / /_/ / /__/ /  __/ /
/_/ /_/\__,_/\___/_/\___/_/   v3.3.4

        projectdiscovery.io

[INF] Current nuclei version: v3.3.4 (latest)
[INF] Current nuclei-templates version: v10.0.2 (latest)
[WRN] Scan results upload to cloud is disabled.
[INF] New templates added in latest release: 68
[INF] Templates loaded for current scan: 1
[WRN] Loading 1 unsigned templates for scan. Use with caution.
[INF] Targets loaded for current scan: 1
daffainfo@root nuclei-templates %

Expected Behavior

daffainfo@root nuclei-templates % nuclei -u http://example/ -t http/cves/2024/CVE-2024-38473.yaml

                     __     _
   ____  __  _______/ /__  (_)
  / __ \/ / / / ___/ / _ \/ /
 / / / / /_/ / /__/ /  __/ /
/_/ /_/\__,_/\___/_/\___/_/   v3.3.4

        projectdiscovery.io

[INF] Current nuclei version: v3.3.4 (latest)
[INF] Current nuclei-templates version: v10.0.2 (latest)
[WRN] Scan results upload to cloud is disabled.
[INF] New templates added in latest release: 68
[INF] Templates loaded for current scan: 1
[WRN] Loading 1 unsigned templates for scan. Use with caution.
[INF] Targets loaded for current scan: 1
[INF] No results found. Better luck next time!
daffainfo@root nuclei-templates %

Steps To Reproduce

  1. Run `nuclei -u http://example/ -t some-templates.yaml

Relevant log output

No response

Environment

Anything else?

No response

pwnhxl commented 1 day ago

http(1) payload add thread: 1 and thread set to 1 will not occur this situation may be concurrent caused by data confusion I also encountered and this issue hope the next version will solve