Open dvhwgumby opened 6 years ago
The library could probably be named libhocon. I think the library name followed from the repository, but hocon
makes more sense to me when including headers for the library.
It wouldn't be much trouble to adapt our process to find libhocon. I'm in favor of this change.
Normally the library onject and header names are consistent -- is this an accident? Are you likely to change this?
I can happily make a pull request but if this would require other changes to your process so that you would ignore it, I won't bother. (I understand the priority of cpp-hocon to puppetlabs is not high -- understandable)