codecov[bot]
commented
5 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 99.84%. Comparing base (
ad50a20) to head (d882820). Report is 69 commits behind head on master.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #1349 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 99.84% 99.84% ======================================= Files 74 74 Lines 10806 10806 ======================================= Hits 10789 10789 Misses 17 17 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/qiboteam/qibo/pull/1349/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=qiboteam) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/qiboteam/qibo/pull/1349/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=qiboteam) | `99.84% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=qiboteam#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
I think the tutorials repository could be a nice place where to delve deeper into details of topics (e.g. in the case of the well documented DBI module) in form of notebooks.
I just opened a PR there: https://github.com/qiboteam/tutorials/pulls. If someone else would prefer to take care of this feel, free to do it. Otherwise we can proceed like I suggested.
I would suggest to leave here at least the intro notebook and the readme file for completeness.
Checklist: