qwaider / morphisto

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/morphisto
0 stars 0 forks source link

verbal prefix "verloren" should be special #9

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
If a linguistic problem:
What wordform makes the faulty analysis occur?
- "verlorenverloren"

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Using:
echo verlorenverloren | fst-infl2 -b smor-ids.ca
reading transducer from file "smor-ids.ca"...
finished.
Result:
> verlorenverloren
verloren<PREF>:<>verli:oe:rr:<>e:<>n:<><+V>:<><1>:e<Pl>:n<Past>:<><Ind>:<>
verloren<PREF>:<>verli:oe:rr:<>e:<>n:<><+V>:<><3>:e<Pl>:n<Past>:<><Ind>:<>
verloren<PREF>:<>verli:oe:rr:<>e:<>n:<><>:e<>:n<V>:<><PPast>:<><SUFF>:<><+ADJ>:<
><Pos>:<><Adv>:<>
verloren<PREF>:<>verli:oe:rr:<>e:<>n:<><>:e<>:n<V>:<><PPast>:<><SUFF>:<><+ADJ>:<
><Pos>:<><Pred>:<>
verloren<PREF>:<>verli:oe:rr:<>e:<>n:<><>:e<>:n<+V>:<><PPast>:<>
etc.
Expected:
No analysis with "verloren" as prefix.

Please provide any additional information below.
I would suggest to add a special origin to those verb stems which may be 
combined with "verloren" and set the origin field of the prefix accordingly. By 
the way, the origin field is a great feature!

Original issue reported on code.google.com by wuerz...@gmail.com on 21 Oct 2010 at 2:30

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by CWRSimon@googlemail.com on 21 Dec 2010 at 9:53