Deprecation warnings in gradle 6.x

[eekboom]

I'd like to keep my code free from gradle deprecation warnings, but there are some warnings that seem to come from the gradle-jaxb-plugin, that I cannot fix in my code, I think:

[frankenpfalzer]

In Gradle 7 this leads to failing builds.

Some problems were found with the configuration of task '...:xsd-dependency-tree' (type 'JaxbDependencyTree').

• Type 'JaxbDependencyTree' property 'dependencyTreeFactory' is missing an input or output annotation.

  Reason: A property without annotation isn't considered during up-to-date checking.

  Possible solutions:

  1. Add an input or output annotation.
  2. Mark it as @Internal.

  Please refer to https://docs.gradle.org/7.0/userguide/validation_problems.html#missing_annotation for more details about this problem.

• Type 'JaxbDependencyTree' property 'docFactory' is missing an input or output annotation.

  Reason: A property without annotation isn't considered during up-to-date checking.

  Possible solutions:

  1. Add an input or output annotation.
  2. Mark it as @Internal.

  Please refer to https://docs.gradle.org/7.0/userguide/validation_problems.html#missing_annotation for more details about this problem.

• Type 'JaxbDependencyTree' property 'externalDependencyResolver' is missing an input or output annotation.

  Reason: A property without annotation isn't considered during up-to-date checking.

  Possible solutions:

  1. Add an input or output annotation.
  2. Mark it as @Internal.

  Please refer to https://docs.gradle.org/7.0/userguide/validation_problems.html#missing_annotation for more details about this problem.

• Type 'JaxbDependencyTree' property 'namespaceResolver' is missing an input or output annotation.

  Reason: A property without annotation isn't considered during up-to-date checking.

  Possible solutions:

  1. Add an input or output annotation.
  2. Mark it as @Internal.

  Please refer to https://docs.gradle.org/7.0/userguide/validation_problems.html#missing_annotation for more details about this problem.

see #51