Closed CharlieLaughton closed 8 years ago
Sry about that .. I renamed the branch to extasy_data. The docs should be updated now.
By “…should be updated now” do you mean “you should find they are now updated”, or “now someone should update them”? Only at the moment they seem the same as before…
From: "Vivekanandan (Vivek) Balasubramanian" notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> Reply-To: radical-cybertools/ExTASY reply@reply.github.com<mailto:reply@reply.github.com> Date: Friday, 18 December 2015 13:59 To: radical-cybertools/ExTASY ExTASY@noreply.github.com<mailto:ExTASY@noreply.github.com> Cc: Charlie Laughton charles.laughton@nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:charles.laughton@nottingham.ac.uk> Subject: Re: [ExTASY] ExTASY 0.2 tutorial files have moved? (#227)
Sry about that .. I renamed the branch to extasy_data. The docs should be updated now.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/radical-cybertools/ExTASY/issues/227#issuecomment-165784213.
This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.
Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
Oops.. sry for the confusion. Meant to say I have updated them now. The link seems to be updated in latest docs: http://extasy.readthedocs.org/en/latest/pages/coam.html#running-on-stampede
Thanks! I have checked and can confirm that all now seems fine.
From: "Vivekanandan (Vivek) Balasubramanian" notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> Reply-To: radical-cybertools/ExTASY reply@reply.github.com<mailto:reply@reply.github.com> Date: Friday, 18 December 2015 15:06 To: radical-cybertools/ExTASY ExTASY@noreply.github.com<mailto:ExTASY@noreply.github.com> Cc: Charlie Laughton charles.laughton@nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:charles.laughton@nottingham.ac.uk> Subject: Re: [ExTASY] ExTASY 0.2 tutorial files have moved? (#227)
Oops.. sry for the confusion. Meant to say I have updated them now. The link seems to be updated in latest docs: http://extasy.readthedocs.org/en/latest/pages/coam.html#running-on-stampede
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/radical-cybertools/ExTASY/issues/227#issuecomment-165799489.
This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.
Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
Thanks for checking !
Trying a fresh work-through the ExTASY 0.2 tutorial to run an Amber/CoCo job on Archer at http://extasy.readthedocs.org/en/extasy_0.2/pages/coam.html, I hit a problem at Step 2:
Has the location of the tarballs changed?