Open AaronCrawfis opened 1 year ago
:wave: @AaronCrawfis Thanks for filing this feature request.
A project maintainer will review this feature request and get back to you soon.
We also welcome community contributions! If you would like to pick this item up sooner and submit a pull request, please visit our contribution guidelines and assign this to yourself by commenting "/assign" on this issue.
For more information on our triage process please visit our triage overview
:+1: We've reviewed this issue and have agreed to add it to our backlog. Please subscribe to this issue for notifications, we'll provide updates when we pick it up.
We also welcome community contributions! If you would like to pick this item up sooner and submit a pull request, please visit our contribution guidelines and assign this to yourself by commenting "/assign" on this issue.
For more information on our triage process please visit our triage overview
on the roadmap. keeping in backlog
This is not done 😆
Overview of feature request
Today, there are a fixed set of portable Radius resources:
These resources have a fixed schema and it allows teams to only select from a pre-defined list.
What's missing is a way for a team at an organization like Contoso to model their own schema and abstractions to work with.
For example, Contoso may want a resource type like:
This would allow developers to select from resource types that are custom to Contoso. This also doesn't have to be limited to storage/messaging resources. Custom types could also encapsulate entire services or dependencies such as:
Acceptance criteria
Additional context
AB#10284