Open raffazizzi opened 9 years ago
This would be an important support for the standoff work indeed. Is the council deciding on this on the fly during the F2F?
Original comment by: laurentromary
The FTF is over (although a few of us are still sitting in the hotel lobby doing tickets while we wait to leave). But I think this is a relatively uncontroversial proposal, it doesn't break backwards compatibility, and we can fast-track it to assist the standoff proposal, so I would expect it to go quickly.
Original comment by: martindholmes
I dont mind this change going forward, though it does reverse a decision taken some time ago by the Council.
Original comment by: lb42
I agree with Lou. However, I didn’t like the previous decision. :-)
Original comment by: sydb
This arose as part of our work on the standoff proposal, but has more general utility:
Certainty expressed by a human judge is typically imprecise, hence the current values of
@cert
; but annotation in particular may be done be tools such as natural language parsers, which express their "judgements" regarding (for instance) a word's being a member of a grammatical category in the form of probability (values between 0 and 1). To support this, the@cert
attribute should have a datatype which is a choice between data.certainty and data.probability.Original comment by: martindholmes