This is a small change aimed to allow the ussage of std::secure_vector<std::byte>. Enum types are POD so this shouldn't cause problems.
I don't see the advantage of allowing enums other than std::byte, but including another header just for this purpose seems unwarranted.
coverage: 91.28%. remained the same
when pulling 4890fc9fab559b437b66e1c5bcee34859d9fd9ce on Delta-dev-99:patch-1
into 7f256a0afe514aa15fee594e0d5e30d2f3f74536 on randombit:master.
This is a small change aimed to allow the ussage of
std::secure_vector<std::byte>
. Enum types are POD so this shouldn't cause problems. I don't see the advantage of allowing enums other thanstd::byte
, but including another header just for this purpose seems unwarranted.