Open Metadorius opened 2 months ago
we'll discuss as a team if we want to keep this PR.
If we bring it across would you be okay just adding some simple unit tests for it?
If we bring it across would you be okay just adding some simple unit tests for it?
Sure, I just was not sure what specifically needs to be tested here (or how, because the effect can vary in different setups), so would not mind an idea on what to write tests for.
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 67.82%. Comparing base (
d75f999
) to head (2880317
). Report is 124 commits behind head on main.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Bug fix?
What is the current behavior?
Originally the
InitializeReactiveUI
function didn't account for order of passed registration, because the allowed namespace dictionary was enumerated instead of the array (which is kind of backwards if you think about it).What is the new behavior?
Order of the namespaces is preserved when registering.
What might this PR break? Multi-platform projects that rely on current non-determinant order may break because of different order of registrations.
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
Other information: Not sure on what kind of tests/docs are expected, so I am leaving it as draft for now, feel free to undraft if you feel this is OK.