search

red-hat-storage / ocs-operator

Operator for RHOCS
Apache License 2.0
86 stars 184 forks source link

Bug 2303028:[release-4.17] Revert "Annotate RBD storageclasses for keyrotation" #2749

Closed openshift-cherrypick-robot closed 1 week ago

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented 4 weeks ago

This is an automated cherry-pick of #2721

/assign black-dragon74

openshift-ci[bot] commented 4 weeks ago

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to assign the following users: black-dragon74.

Note that only red-hat-storage members with read permissions, repo collaborators and people who have commented on this issue/PR can be assigned. Additionally, issues/PRs can only have 10 assignees at the same time. For more information please see the contributor guide

In response to [this](https://github.com/red-hat-storage/ocs-operator/pull/2749): >This is an automated cherry-pick of #2721 > >/assign black-dragon74 Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes-sigs/prow](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/prow/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
iamniting commented 4 weeks ago

@black-dragon74 Can you pls add the bug here?

black-dragon74 commented 4 weeks ago

/retitle Bug 2303028: [release-4.17] Revert "Annotate RBD storageclasses for keyrotation"

openshift-ci[bot] commented 4 weeks ago

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2303028, which is invalid:

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to [this](https://github.com/red-hat-storage/ocs-operator/pull/2749): >Bug 2303028: [release-4.17] Revert "Annotate RBD storageclasses for keyrotation" Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes-sigs/prow](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/prow/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
iamniting commented 3 weeks ago

@black-dragon74 Can you pls get the acks on the BZ?

black-dragon74 commented 3 weeks ago

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

@black-dragon74: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2303028, which is invalid:

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to [this](https://github.com/red-hat-storage/ocs-operator/pull/2749#issuecomment-2298030420): >/bugzilla refresh Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes-sigs/prow](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/prow/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
malayparida2000 commented 3 weeks ago

@black-dragon74 Can you please get all the acks on the BZ so that the fix can be merged. The BZ has devel ack, but qa_ack is not there. Please ask someone from QE to provide it.

iamniting commented 1 week ago

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci[bot] commented 1 week ago

@iamniting: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2303028, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug * bug is open, matching expected state (open) * bug target release (ODF 4.17.0) matches configured target release for branch (ODF 4.17.0) * bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (ebenahar@redhat.com), skipping review request.

In response to [this](https://github.com/red-hat-storage/ocs-operator/pull/2749#issuecomment-2324755454): >/bugzilla refresh Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes-sigs/prow](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/prow/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
openshift-ci[bot] commented 1 week ago

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: iamniting, openshift-cherrypick-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files: - ~~[OWNERS](https://github.com/red-hat-storage/ocs-operator/blob/release-4.17/OWNERS)~~ [iamniting] Approvers can indicate their approval by writing `/approve` in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing `/approve cancel` in a comment
openshift-ci[bot] commented 1 week ago

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2303028 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to [this](https://github.com/red-hat-storage/ocs-operator/pull/2749): >Bug 2303028:[release-4.17] Revert "Annotate RBD storageclasses for keyrotation" Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes-sigs/prow](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/prow/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.