rhodges / watershed-priorities

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/watershed-priorities
Other
0 stars 0 forks source link

Standardize costs to the cumulative penalty and allow user control of cost:penalty ratio #4

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Need to 

a) automatically adjust costs according to input penalties
b) provide a way to "slide" total cost (lowering cost = penalties are more 
important = include more watersheds.)

Original issue reported on code.google.com by perrygeo...@gmail.com on 17 Oct 2011 at 5:41

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by perrygeo...@gmail.com on 17 Oct 2011 at 5:44

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by perrygeo...@gmail.com on 17 Oct 2011 at 6:21

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by perrygeo...@gmail.com on 17 Oct 2011 at 6:24

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by perrygeo...@gmail.com on 17 Oct 2011 at 6:24

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
currently just taking 10 * species penalty
need to have near-final dataset to calibrate properly

Original comment by perrygeo...@gmail.com on 3 Nov 2011 at 9:03

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Added slider for user-control; need data to calibrate

Original comment by perrygeo...@gmail.com on 9 Nov 2011 at 7:54

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
scaling factor slider very sensitive and hard to explain to user - can we 
autodetect the sweet spot?

Original comment by perrygeo...@gmail.com on 18 Nov 2011 at 7:05

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
gonna rewrite this one based on 11/17 discussion

Original comment by perrygeo...@gmail.com on 18 Nov 2011 at 7:14