Closed jenniferward closed 1 year ago
On second thought, this might be better in the 100: 100 $l - Language of a work but it is not repeatable.
Sorry, but aren't you confusing language note in the bibliographic record (https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd546.html) with the language ($l) of a work ($t) in the authority one?
In the bibliographic record, effectively 546 matches, in natural language, the code in 041.
We need a way to indicate the language for work authorities.
You are right, certainly.
Related to #849, would be nice for 6.4
It would be good in work records for vocal pieces to name the language. MARC 377 seems to allow this: https://www.loc.gov/marc/authority/ad377.html and it is repeatable.
It should be a drop-down menu and include all the values as in the 041 in Sources.