Open chrissprague opened 10 years ago
tl;dr - make sure exam reviews are consistent in having section titles
It looks like CS1 and MoP use the pattern of sectioning off topics by section, for example, see http://csc.cs.rit.edu/media/exam_reviews/CSC-141-Exam2-Review-2014-ANSWERS.pdf (note this link might not always be available) - the first section is Linked Lists, the next is Stacks and Queues, so on and so forth.
Our CS2 Exam 2 review doesn't have sections (see http://csc.cs.rit.edu/media/exam_reviews/CSC-142-Exam2-Review-2014-ANSWERS_2.pdf), and I wouldn't be surprised if this is the case for a few of our other exam reviews.
We should standardize this.
TODO:
tl;dr - make sure exam reviews are consistent in having section titles
It looks like CS1 and MoP use the pattern of sectioning off topics by section, for example, see http://csc.cs.rit.edu/media/exam_reviews/CSC-141-Exam2-Review-2014-ANSWERS.pdf (note this link might not always be available) - the first section is Linked Lists, the next is Stacks and Queues, so on and so forth.
Our CS2 Exam 2 review doesn't have sections (see http://csc.cs.rit.edu/media/exam_reviews/CSC-142-Exam2-Review-2014-ANSWERS_2.pdf), and I wouldn't be surprised if this is the case for a few of our other exam reviews.
We should standardize this.