Closed doudou closed 9 years ago
hm. created an additional pull-request for this branch from an updated version of this branch in my fork... well... anyhow: changes here look fine to merge
ah, just because I previously stumbled over this while reading the diffs: its really and intentionally meant to be syskit instanciate
??? It is a misspelling of instantiate. And its all over the place. But I assume nobody is ever going to fix this wart?
ah, just because I previously stumbled over this while reading the diffs: its really and intentionally meant to be syskit instanciate??? It is a misspelling of instantiate. And its all over the place. But I assume nobody is ever going to fix this wart?
Let's say that everyone got used to it ... Bloody french. Using a c in instantiate. What a bunch of douchebags :P
And merged
;-)
Meta-Opinion: Stuff like this should be fixed in an honest framework...
Meta-Opinion: Stuff like this should be fixed in an honest framework...
Agreed. The problem is that the priority of something like that is IMO very low (especially since it is both (1) pretty harmless and (2) really painful to fix since the code itself uses instanciate too)
I would not reject pull requests which fix the spelling in a backward-compatible way, though.
This is a cherry-pick of the work by @charrius and supersedes #6, #7 and #8