Closed qwerty287 closed 2 years ago
Hello! Thanks for the suggestion. Although I don't understand what's the issue here. I can't alter the user's decision in a hidden way. If the user wants all 6k satellites - there you go. Also, one does not simply need the map to track satellites, it's there to be a fancy decoration. So there is no usecase for tracking 6k satellites and observing them on the map.
Sure, but maybe you can add a setting to display a maximum of x satellites?
No, definitely don't want to do that. Because the use case doesn't seem valid to me.
OK, I'm fine with this.
As a practical matter, how would one decide on subset of x satellites to display? Let's say I select all the starlinks... what would be a good strategy to select which ones to show? What if there are some I always want to know about wherever they are (ISS), potentially in relation to some other constellation (eg. Iridium?) - how would I pin the ISS to never be downsampled? What if the constellation I'm interested in is just a couple satellites larger than the arbitrary limit?
I'm with @rt-bishop on this... just display what the user selected, and let them decide on the set of satellites that are interesting enough relative to the refresh rate.
This is kind of a a bug:
It will load a while and is unusable then. My suggestion would be to only display the next ~10 satellites on the map to improve performance of it. Thanks!