rubberdok / indok-web

Website for students at Industrial Economics and Technology Management, NTNU Trondheim.
https://www.indokntnu.no
MIT License
23 stars 5 forks source link

fix: Misleading tooltip #2098

Closed MagnusHafstad closed 1 month ago

MagnusHafstad commented 1 month ago

Changes

Look at the issue. This PR fixes it

-https://github.com/rubberdok/indok-web/issues/2070

vercel[bot] commented 1 month ago

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
indok-web ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 7, 2024 4:06pm
codecov[bot] commented 1 month ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 83.28%. Comparing base (7e34142) to head (70d60f4). Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #2098 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 83.28% 83.28% ======================================= Files 100 100 Lines 3572 3572 ======================================= Hits 2975 2975 Misses 597 597 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/rubberdok/indok-web/pull/2098/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=rubberdok) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [apitests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/rubberdok/indok-web/pull/2098/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=rubberdok) | `83.28% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=rubberdok#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

cypress[bot] commented 1 month ago

Indøk Web    Run #3316

Run Properties:  status check passed Passed #3316  •  git commit 9f9d6b0a21 ℹ️: Merge 70d60f479ff724f75f2e7753ec9fc25f16d574f4 into 7e34142d05f32cbf719e153d737f...
Project Indøk Web
Branch Review fix-tooltip
Run status status check passed Passed #3316
Run duration 01m 39s
Commit git commit 9f9d6b0a21 ℹ️: Merge 70d60f479ff724f75f2e7753ec9fc25f16d574f4 into 7e34142d05f32cbf719e153d737f...
Committer MagnusHafstad
View all properties for this run ↗︎

Test results
Tests that failed  Failures 0
Tests that were flaky  Flaky 0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skip  Pending 0
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hook  Skipped 0
Tests that passed  Passing 2
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎
sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 month ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

cypress[bot] commented 1 month ago

Indøk Web    Run #3324

Run Properties:  status check passed Passed #3324  •  git commit 1993cc07d9: fix: Misleading tooltip (#2098)
Project Indøk Web
Run status status check passed Passed #3324
Run duration 01m 35s
Commit git commit 1993cc07d9: fix: Misleading tooltip (#2098)
Committer Torgeir Lysen
View all properties for this run ↗︎

Test results
Tests that failed  Failures 0
Tests that were flaky  Flaky 0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skip  Pending 0
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hook  Skipped 0
Tests that passed  Passing 2