search

rubberdok / indok-web

Website for students at Industrial Economics and Technology Management, NTNU Trondheim.
https://www.indokntnu.no
MIT License
23 stars 5 forks source link

Pages order info #2104

Closed erikaas24 closed 3 weeks ago

erikaas24 commented 1 month ago

Changes

What has been done

vercel[bot] commented 1 month ago

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
indok-web ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 7, 2024 4:15pm
codecov[bot] commented 1 month ago

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 81.81818% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 83.29%. Comparing base (e6f2a93) to head (503ba00). Report is 21 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
backend/apps/ecommerce/resolvers.py 80.00% 2 Missing :warning:
Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #2104 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 83.28% 83.29% ======================================= Files 100 100 Lines 3572 3580 +8 ======================================= + Hits 2975 2982 +7 - Misses 597 598 +1 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/rubberdok/indok-web/pull/2104/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=rubberdok) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [apitests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/rubberdok/indok-web/pull/2104/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=rubberdok) | `83.29% <81.81%> (+<0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=rubberdok#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

cypress[bot] commented 1 month ago

Indøk Web    Run #3342

Run Properties:  status check passed Passed #3342  •  git commit 00f7867797 ℹ️: Merge 503ba0071cf1b8fedc3a990f2532cf2beea67c03 into a0974e286987be112a87fbabf978...
Project Indøk Web
Branch Review Pages-order-info
Run status status check passed Passed #3342
Run duration 01m 36s
Commit git commit 00f7867797 ℹ️: Merge 503ba0071cf1b8fedc3a990f2532cf2beea67c03 into a0974e286987be112a87fbabf978...
Committer Erik Aas
View all properties for this run ↗︎
Test results
Tests that failed  Failures 0
Tests that were flaky  Flaky 0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skip  Pending 0
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hook  Skipped 0
Tests that passed  Passing 2
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎
MagnusHafstad commented 1 month ago

The E2E tests are a bit flaky. If it fails try to run it again bu pressing details then rerun jobs. It I higly doubt the fail on E2E1 is acutally your doing. That said if rerunning does not fix it you shouldn't merge.

sonarcloud[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
1 New issue
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
2.2% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

cypress[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Indøk Web    Run #3343

Run Properties:  status check passed Passed #3343  •  git commit a48df64d7f: Pages order info (#2104)
Project Indøk Web
Branch Review main
Run status status check passed Passed #3343
Run duration 01m 42s
Commit git commit a48df64d7f: Pages order info (#2104)
Committer Erik Aas
View all properties for this run ↗︎
Test results
Tests that failed  Failures 0
Tests that were flaky  Flaky 0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skip  Pending 0
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hook  Skipped 0
Tests that passed  Passing 2
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎