Open ChrisDenton opened 1 month ago
I'd emphasise that the use of dllimport was already decided in the RFC. This is just for applying them without giving a lib name. Given the limited scope of this I was persuaded that it doesn't need a new RFC but it still needs some form of @rust-lang/lang approval.
This is spun off from RFC 1717 (rust-lang/rfcs#1717) which is already implemented for
#[link(name = "...", kind = "dylib")]
The feature gate for the issue is#![feature(bare_link_kind)]
.Summary
rust-lang/rfcs#1717 implemented
dllimport
semantics for Windows externs (see the RFC for details). That is, it tells codegen to mark an item as being imported from a DLL:This tracking issue is for applying dllimport without knowing the lib name. E.g.:
Only "dylib" and "static" kinds are allowed to be used without supplying a name.
About tracking issues
Tracking issues are used to record the overall progress of implementation. They are also used as hubs connecting to other relevant issues, e.g., bugs or open design questions. A tracking issue is however not meant for large scale discussion, questions, or bug reports about a feature. Instead, open a dedicated issue for the specific matter and add the relevant feature gate label. Discussion comments will get marked as off-topic or deleted. Repeated discussions on the tracking issue may lead to the tracking issue getting locked.
Steps
Unresolved Questions
Implementation history
37973