Steps outlined in https://github.com/rustprooflabs/pgosm-flex/issues/293#issuecomment-1396371476, but for the second docker exec leave in the --pgosm-date 2022-12-30. (Context: Today is 2023-01-18). Using osm2pgsql-replication will update to today's data, but osm.pgosm_flex.osm_date reports the value given (2022-12-30).
What did you expect to happen?
When osm2pgsql-replication is updating the data, the --pgosm-date should be ignored. I'm leaning towards failing the subsequent load with --replication if --pgosm-date is provided.
Currently I can get results like this...
SELECT id, imported, osm_date, pgosm_flex_version,
osm2pgsql_mode
FROM osm.pgosm_flex
ORDER BY imported
;
What version of PgOSM Flex are you using?
0.7.0.rc.1 via Docker
What did you do exactly?
Steps outlined in https://github.com/rustprooflabs/pgosm-flex/issues/293#issuecomment-1396371476, but for the second
docker exec
leave in the--pgosm-date 2022-12-30
. (Context: Today is 2023-01-18). Usingosm2pgsql-replication
will update to today's data, butosm.pgosm_flex.osm_date
reports the value given (2022-12-30
).What did you expect to happen?
When
osm2pgsql-replication
is updating the data, the--pgosm-date
should be ignored.I'm leaning towards failing the subsequent load with--replication
if--pgosm-date
is provided.Currently I can get results like this...