Closed vincentARM closed 5 years ago
Hello. Config file is ok in buster 32bits. but in container 64 bits error is : ● ssh.service - OpenBSD Secure Shell server Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/ssh.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Thu 2019-11-21 15:13:54 CET; 51ms ago Docs: man:sshd(8) man:sshd_config(5) Process: 809 ExecStartPre=/usr/sbin/sshd -t (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) Process: 810 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/sshd -D $SSHD_OPTS (code=exited, status=255/EXCEPTION) Main PID: 810 (code=exited, status=255/EXCEPTION)
nov. 21 15:13:54 debian-buster-64 systemd[1]: Starting OpenBSD Secure Shell server... nov. 21 15:13:54 debian-buster-64 sshd[810]: error: Bind to port 22 on 0.0.0.0 failed: Address already in use. nov. 21 15:13:54 debian-buster-64 sshd[810]: error: Bind to port 22 on :: failed: Address already in use. nov. 21 15:13:54 debian-buster-64 sshd[810]: fatal: Cannot bind any address.
I am not competent to solve this problem because I already lost all the connections with the raspberry while trying to modify the file of configuration.
The way things are set up, both container and host share the same networking subsystem (for convenience).
What is happening is that you already have an sshd
server in the host (outer, 32-bit, Raspbian) system running, and this is bound to port 22 (the default).
When you try to start another sshd
in the guest (inner, 64-bit, Debian) container, it (by default) also tries to bind to port 22, finds this port is already in use, and exits.
To work around this, simply edit /etc/ssh/sshd_config
in the guest (using nano
or similar) and then uncomment and change the Port
directive (to use, say, Port 8022
). Then start the service, and direct your ssh
client to that port.
Oh yes. It is Ok with changing port. thanck you very much.
Glad to hear it is working for you now ^-^ Closing.
Hello. In 32 bits, create X11 windows is OK. In container 64 bits , i have a error message : pi@debian-buster-64:~/asm64/projet_X11 $ creatfen641 PuTTY X11 proxy: Unsupported authorisation protocol
Do you have a correction for this error ? thanck you.