Open xhernandez opened 4 months ago
/retest centos-ci/gpfs
/retest centos-ci/gpfs
the changes LGTM, but wondering if " Updates: #102" in the description and commit message should be "Resolves:" or "Fixes:" ...
There are two backends affected by the EOL of CentOS 8 Stream: GPFS and GlusterFS. This PR only tries to fix part of the problem. We'll need to decide what to do with GlusterFS and, maybe, send another patch to fix it. Using "Fixes" would close the issue once the PR is merged, which I don't want. I thought "Updates" is good enough (we used this for multi-patch issues in GlusterFS).
This patch removes the requirement of CentOS 8 Stream for the storage nodes of the GPFS backend. That requirement was needed because of an incompatibility of the CentOS 9 Stream's ansible version and the ansible playbooks of the Storage Scale installer.
Updates: #102